A massive new study from leading researchers in Brazil has raised fresh red flags about the safety of Covid “vaccines,” finding statistically significant increases in life-threatening conditions during the period of mass “vaccination.”
Researchers at Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Brazil’s leading public health institute, examined over 76 million hospitalizations in the national health system between 2015 and 2022.
Their goal was to determine whether the unprecedented “vaccination” campaign that began in June 2021 coincided with measurable spikes in serious medical emergencies known as adverse events of special interest (AESIs).
These AESIs are no minor ailments.
They include sudden deaths, neurological damage, heart inflammation, clotting disorders, and autoimmune complications.
These conditions are flagged by the Brighton Collaboration and monitored globally by the World Health Organization (WHO).
The findings of the study were published in the SSRN medical journal.
Of the 76.3 million admissions reviewed, 3.69 million involved AESI diagnoses.
While most conditions remained stable, five outcomes showed troubling and statistically significant increases following the “vaccine” rollout:
- Anaphylaxis (severe allergic reaction): up 17%
- Generalized convulsions: up 12%
- Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS): up 19%
- Myocarditis/pericarditis (heart inflammation): up 14%
- Other acute cardiac injuries: up 5%
These signals mirror international warnings, including myocarditis cases tied to mRNA shots in young men and GBS linked to adenovirus-vectored vaccines.
The authors caution that these findings must not be brushed aside.
They write that such signals may represent “smoking guns of causation” that demand urgent investigation.
The math is sobering and reveals that, when hundreds of millions are injected, even “rare” one-in-a-million risks translate into thousands of shattered lives.
Brazil’s data prove that transparent, nationwide surveillance can expose dangers quickly.
The real question is whether governments and health agencies elsewhere have the independence, or courage, to act on the evidence instead of sweeping it under the rug.
Unlike many Western studies funded by pharmaceutical companies, this Brazilian research relied solely on open-access public health data.
The FIOCRUZ team declared no conflicts of interest, no patient-level privacy concerns, and no outside funding.
In other words, this was science free from the grip of Big Pharma’s profit machine.
The researchers stressed that surveillance systems of this scale are critical for spotting safety problems in real time.
But spotting the signals is not enough.
Follow-up studies, accountability, and full transparency are necessary, or else injured patients will remain abandoned and dismissed as “collateral damage.”
The study concludes bluntly that large-scale Covid “vaccination” campaigns correlate with measurable spikes in serious adverse events.
For millions worldwide, that’s not just a statistical anomaly; it’s a devastating reality.
The Brazilian study is not an isolated outlier, however.
The findings fit into a growing tapestry of signals that demand attention.
A multinational analysis of nearly 99 million vaccinated individuals, led by the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN), confirmed pre-established safety signals for myocarditis, pericarditis, Guillain–Barré syndrome, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis after both mRNA and viral vector vaccines.
Dangerous neurological conditions like acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and transverse myelitis were also flagged.
Japan, which administered one of the highest numbers of mRNA doses per capita, experienced a staggering excess mortality rate of over 1,400 deaths per million in 2023—even though confirmed COVID-19 deaths accounted for just 10% of that total.
The government’s vaccination injury fund has already processed payouts for thousands of serious reactions and deaths, including in children.
Moreover, a study of 47 Western countries reported more than 3 million excess deaths from 2020 to 2022, with researchers urging deeper investigation into possible vaccine-related contributions alongside other factors.
While health agencies push back, citing Covid infections and lockdown consequences as driving factors, they admit the full picture remains unexplained—and data transparency remains deficient.
This isn’t just data. It’s a flashing red warning from Brazil—and echoed globally—that large-scale vaccine safety surveillance must not end when injection programs do.
Whether it’s Brazil, international data networks, or excess death trends, the signals are there:
- Vaccine injury risks, though rare, are real and detectable in big datasets.
- Global analyses confirm known dangers but also reveal emerging, poorly studied threats.
- Rising unexplained deaths raise critical questions about hidden harms.
If governments won’t follow through with transparent post-market monitoring, accountability, and informed choice, these invisible harms remain buried, while the public pays the price.
Our comment section is restricted to members of the Slay News community only.
To join, create a free account HERE.
If you are already a member, log in HERE.