Facebook Censored ‘Often-True Content’ on Covid Shots to Appease Biden White House, Emails Show

A bombshell batch of emails between the White House and Facebook executives reveals that the social media giant has been censoring “often-true content” about COVID-19 vaccines to appease the Biden administration.

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey released the documents earlier this week.

The emails show a Facebook official admitted to suppressing information that isn’t false because it conflicts with the Biden admin’s narrative.

Aside from censoring true content that is shared a lot, the Facebook staffer assures the White House that the Big Tech company will “remove these Groups, Pages, and Accounts” that share popular information that may create “vaccine hesitancy.”

Bailey obtained the emails through a court case, Missouri v. Biden.

The case alleges that some of Democrat President Joe Biden’s top officials “colluded with Big Tech social media companies to violate Americans’ right to free speech under the First Amendment.”

“I want to protect Missourians and the freedoms they enjoy, which is why as attorney general, I will always defend the Constitution,” Bailey told The Daily Signal in an email Thursday.

“This case is about the Biden administration’s blatant disregard for the First Amendment and its collusion with Big Tech social media companies to suppress speech it disagrees with.”

“I will always fight back against unelected bureaucrats who seek to indoctrinate the people of this state by violating our constitutional right to free and open debate,” the Missouri attorney general pledged.

In an email to the White House dated March 21, 2021, a Facebook staff member discussed “levers for tackling vaccine hesitancy content” with Andrew Slavitt, then a senior adviser on Biden’s COVID-19 response team, and Rob Flaherty, White House director of digital strategy.

Slay the latest News for free!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

“You also asked us about our levers for reducing virality of vaccine hesitancy content,” wrote the Facebook staffer, whose identity was redacted.

“As you know, in addition to removing vaccine misinformation, we have been focused on reducing the virality of content discouraging vaccines that does not contain actionable information.

“This is often-true content, which we allow at the post level because it is important for people to be able to discuss both their personal experiences and concerns about the vaccine, but it can be framed as sensation, alarmist, or shocking.”

We’ll remove these Groups, Pages, and Accounts when they are disproportionately promoting this sensationalized content,” the Facebook staffer promised the Biden White House.

“More on this front as we proceed to implement,” he or she then asserted.

In this email to the White House, the Facebook representative admitted to preventing the exposure of content that doesn’t violate Facebook’s policies.

They said they are blocking content that isn’t “actionable.”

The staffer also suggests that the White House had asked Facebook to take these measures.

In an April 22, 2021, email, Flaherty told Google staff that the White House remains “concerned that Youtube [sic] is ‘funneling’ people into hesitance and intensifying people’s hesitancy.

“We certainly recognize that removing content that is unfavorable to the cause of increasing vaccine adoption is not a realistic—or even good—solution.”

The White House’s digital strategy chief added that combating vaccine hesitancy “is a concern that is shared at the highest (and I mean highest) levels of the WH [White House],” an apparent reference to the president himself.

In an April 14, 2021, email to Facebook, Flaherty suggested the social media platform should take action to suppress Fox News host Tucker Carlson and conservative journalist Tomi Lahren.

“Since we’ve been on the phone—the top post about vaccines today is tucker [sic] Carlson saying they don’t work,” Flaherty wrote.

“Yesterday was Tomi Lehren [sic] saying she won’t take one.

“This is exactly why I want to know what ‘Reduction’ actually looks like—if ‘reduction’ means ‘pumping our most vaccine-hesitant audience with tucker [sic] Carlson saying it doesn’t work’ then …

“I’m not sure it’s reduction!”

In a May 12, 2021, email, the White House’s Flaherty faulted Instagram, which Facebook owns, for failing to remove “bad information” from its search function.

He appears aggressive in pushing for censorship.

“You know and I know that the universe of undecided people searching Instagram for ‘vaccines’—as compared to, say, Google—is probably low,” Flaherty wrote.

“But ‘removing bad information from search’ is one of the easy, low-bar things you guys do to make people like me think you’re taking action.

“If you’re not getting that right, it raises even more questions about the high bar stuff.”

“You say in your note that you remove accounts that discourage vaccination from appearing in recommendations (even though you’re using ‘primarily’ to give yourself wiggle room),” Flaherty added.

“You also said you don’t promote those accounts in search.”

Then Flaherty compared Instagram to other social media platforms.

“Youtube [sic], for their warts, has done pretty well at promoting authoritative info in search results while keeping the bad stuff off of those surfaces,” the White House official said.

“Pinterest doesn’t even show you any results other than official information when you search for ‘vaccines.’

“I don’t know why you guys can’t figure this out.”

These documents confirm the close relationship between the federal government and Big Tech companies that Elon Musk has been exposing in the recently released “Twitter Files.”

Internal Twitter documents, released under new CEO Musk’s direction, show the Justice Department and FBI pressuring tech companies such as Twitter to stifle and suppress “misinformation,” particularly regarding the COVID-19 pandemic.

In some cases, Twitter executives and government officials took aim at scientists who shared their professional opinions on the social media platform.

The FBI also paid Twitter more than $3 million while the intelligence community was pressuring the tech company to suppress news about Hunter Biden, the president’s son.

READ MORE: Pfizer Pressured Twitter to Censor Natural Immunity Information

Share this:

join telegram

READERS' POLL

Who is the best president?

By completing this poll, you gain access to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.

By Frank Bergman

Frank Bergman is a political/economic journalist living on the east coast. Aside from news reporting, Bergman also conducts interviews with researchers and material experts and investigates influential individuals and organizations in the sociopolitical world.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x