A new German study has warned that there is a major information gap in the establishment medical industry regarding cases of “post-Covid vaccination syndrome.”
The study was led by Dr. Kerstin Wüstner, a psychology professor at Berlin School of Economics and Law.
Wüstner found that, despite widespread “vaccination” during the COVID-19 pandemic and rising reports of lingering post-vaccine health issues, there is a surprising lack of scientific research on post-Covid vaccination syndrome (PCVS).
While it is commonly referred to as PCVS, the condition has also been referred to as vaccine-induced AIDS or Vaccine-Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (VAIDS).
However, health officials, corporate media outlets, and so-called “fact-checkers” have sought to label reports on PCVS as “conspiracy theories,” leaving patients in the shadows.
Professor Wüstner’s study sought to determine what peer-reviewed research exists on PCVS and assess the broader implications of its apparent absence.
This was a qualitative literature review and critical commentary.
Wüstner conducted a systematic search across four major academic databases—BASE, PubMed, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO.
She used search terms related to PCVS and patient experience.
The final search, completed on September 27, 2024, filtered out articles not directly focused on patient experience related to PCVS.
Non-peer-reviewed public discourse and commentary from online physician platforms (e.g., DocCheck) were also examined for illustrative purposes.
The study adhered to open science standards and was conducted without external funding or institutional bias.
The literature search revealed a striking vacuum: no peer-reviewed studies were found that directly examined the lived experience of PCVS patients in Germany.
This stands in contrast to robust literature on “long Covid,” vaccine safety, and adverse events of special interest (AESIs) such as myocarditis, thrombosis, and autoimmune phenomena.
The Paul-Ehrlich-Institut had received over 1,500 PCVS-related reports.
The reports include references to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), and post-exertional malaise.
However, systematic clinical research on these patients was absent.
Instead, patient voices appeared primarily in the media, where individuals described symptoms such as chronic fatigue, dizziness, autoimmune disorders, neurological dysfunction, and cardiovascular disturbances.
Yet even in the media, coverage was sporadic.
Sleazy “fact-checkers” often pounce on such reports, likely leading to outlets fearing their reputations will be harmed for reporting on these cases.
Public and professional discourse often minimized PCVS or cast doubt on its legitimacy.
Some physicians are even attributing symptoms to psychological factors, hypochondria, or “misinformation.”
Vaccine-injured patients often experienced the action known as gaslighting, a form of psychological manipulation where someone is made to doubt their own sanity, perceptions, or memory.
An analysis of commentary on medical forums revealed a polarized and, at times, stigmatizing atmosphere.
Some professionals simply dismiss PCVS sufferers and those who acknowledge the lack of support patients face.
Despite more than 11,000 German citizens applying for vaccine injury compensation, and 467 cases officially recognized as of early 2024, most remain unresolved or denied.
The disconnect between political rhetoric promoting “vaccine” safety and patients’ lived experience was highlighted as a major driver of distress, alienation, and loss of trust.
Despite widespread reports of adverse events following Covid “vaccination” and thousands of patients reporting persistent symptoms, Germany has failed to produce research on the lived experience of those affected by post-Covid vaccination syndrome.
However, this issue is not limited to Germany, and it has been reflected in much of the scientific world.
This silence represents more than a scientific oversight; it reflects systemic biases, political discomfort, and institutional inertia.
Patients experiencing PCVS often face skepticism, delayed care, and stigmatization, deepening their suffering and undermining public trust.
The implications are urgent.
Without a scientific understanding of PCVS—its frequency, mechanisms, and treatment needs—affected individuals are marginalized, and vaccine safety oversight remains incomplete.
Public health credibility requires not only robust data collection but also the ethical obligation to listen.
Wüstner calls for immediate investment in PCVS research, healthcare infrastructure to support affected patients, and a more transparent and humane public health dialogue.
READ MORE – South Korea Sounds Alarm as Death Surge Linked to Covid ‘Vaccines’
