Jim Jordan Orders Manhattan DA to Testify before Congress about Trump Indictment

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH), House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY), and House Administration Committee Chairman Bryan Steil (R-WI) have sent a letter to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg demanding his testimony before Congress.

The top Republicans are also demanding Bragg’s communications and documents related to his potential indictment of President Donald Trump.

The letter says: โ€œYou are reportedly about to engage in an unprecedented abuse of prosecutorial authority: the indictment of a former President of the United States and current declared candidate for that office.

โ€œThis indictment comes after years of your office searching for a basisโ€”any basisโ€”on which to bring charges, ultimately settling on a novel legal theory untested anywhere in the country and one that federal authorities declined to pursue.

โ€œIf these reports are accurate, your actions will erode confidence in the evenhanded application of justice and unalterably interfere in the course of the 2024 presidential election.

โ€œIn light of the serious consequences of your actions, we expect that you will testify about what plainly appears to be a politically motivated prosecutorial decision.

โ€œThe New York County District Attorneyโ€™s Office has been investigating President Trump since at least 2018, looking for some legal theory on which to bring charges.

โ€œThe facts surrounding the impending indictment have โ€˜been known for years.โ€™ Michael Cohen, President Trumpโ€™s disgraced former lawyer, pleaded guilty over four years ago to charges based on the same facts at issue in the impending indictment.

TOP DEAL FROM PREMIUM GADGET STORE

โ€œBy July 2019, however, federal prosecutors determined that no additional people would be charged alongside Cohen.

โ€œNow, in the words of one legal scholar, you are attempting to โ€˜shoehornโ€™ the same case with identical facts into a new prosecution, resurrecting a so-called โ€˜zombieโ€™ case against President Trump.

โ€œEven the Washington Post quoted โ€˜legal expertsโ€™ as calling your actions โ€˜unusualโ€™ because โ€˜prosecutors have repeatedly examined the long-established details but decided not to pursue charges.โ€™

โ€œIn addition to the novel and untested legal theory, your star witness for this prosecution has a serious credibility problemโ€”a problem that you have reportedly recognized.

Slay the latest News for free!

We donโ€™t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

โ€œThis case relies heavily on the testimony of Michael Cohen, a convicted perjurer with a demonstrable prejudice against President Trump.

โ€œCohen pleaded guilty to lying to Congress in 2018. In 2019, when he testified before Democrats on the House Oversight Committee to aid their fruitless investigation into President Trump, Cohen lied againโ€”six times.

โ€œCohen has been vocal about his deeply personal animus toward President Trump. Under these circumstances, there is no scenario in which Cohen could fairly be considered an unbiased and credible witness.

โ€œYour decision to pursue such a politically motivated prosecutionโ€”while adopting progressive criminal justice policies that allow career โ€˜criminals [to] run[ ] the streetsโ€™ of Manhattan โ€”requires congressional scrutiny about how public safety funds appropriated by Congress are implemented by local law-enforcement agencies.

โ€œIn addition, your apparent decision to pursue criminal charges where federal authorities declined to do so requires oversight to inform potential legislative reforms about the delineation of prosecutorial authority between federal and local officials.

โ€œFinally, because the circumstances of this matter stem, in part, from Special Counsel Muellerโ€™s investigation, Congress may consider legislative reforms to the authorities of special counsels and their relationships with other prosecuting entities.

โ€œAccordingly, to advance our oversight, please produce the following documents and information for the period January 1, 2017, to the present:

  1. All documents and communications between or among the New York County District Attorneyโ€™s Office and the U.S. Department of Justice, its component entities, or other federal law enforcement agencies referring or relating to your officeโ€™s investigation of President Donald Trump;
  2. All documents and communications sent or received by former employees Carey Dunne and Mark Pomerantz referring or relating to President Donald Trump; and

3. All documents and communications referring or relating to the New York County District Attorney Officeโ€™s receipt and use of federal funds,โ€ the letter says.

โ€œIn addition, your testimony is necessary to advance our oversight and to inform potential legislative reforms,โ€ the letter says.

SHARE:
join telegram

READERS' POLL

Who is the best president?

By completing this poll, you gain access to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.

Our comment section is restricted to members of the Slay News community only.

To join, create a free account HERE.

If you are already a member, log in HERE.

Subscribe
Notify of

Recommended

8
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x