Landmark Library of Evidence Exposes Covid 'Vaccine' Harms

A massive scientific library of over 700 peer-reviewed studies is blowing the lid off the mainstream narrative that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are “safe and effective.”

The library was compiled by leading scientists and researchers, including Dr. Martin Wucher, Dr. Byram Bridle, Dr. Steven Hatfill, and Erik Sass.

The collection of documents exposes serious, systemic biological harms linked directly to the injections.

The explosive library of evidence has just been published on Zenodo.

Far from fringe speculation, this is hard scientific evidence.

All of the studies used in the library are peer-reviewed and published in respected medical journals.

For the first time, they have now been collected into one bombshell research library.

The bombshell takeaway from the library is the sheer volume of evidence proving that Covid mRNA injections cause unprecedented levels of deaths, disease, and injury.

Renowned McCullough Foundation epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, warns that the library “confirms the fundamental biological dangers posed by mRNA technology.”

In a post on his Substack, Hulscher provides a brief summary of the main sections of the library:

I. Spike Protein Toxicity — 375 Studies

The first section covers 375 peer-reviewed studies showing that the spike protein itself is biologically toxic, even without the virus.

That same spike protein is intentionally produced by the mRNA shots in high amounts.

Originally marketed as simply a “key” to unlock cells and generate a brief immune response, the spike protein has now been shown to be inflammatory, damaging to cells, and potentially cytotoxic.

II. mRNA and Spike Protein Biodistribution — 61 Studies

The second section documents how the spike protein and the mRNA instructions that create it don’t stay in the arm as public health authorities originally promised.

Instead, they circulate throughout the body, embedding themselves in the heart, brain, ovaries, testes, and other vital organs.

This systemic spread has been linked to everything from myocarditis to neurological complications, and 61 peer-reviewed studies back up those findings.

III. Persistence in the Body — 41 Studies

Despite early claims from the CDC and FDA that the vaccine components would degrade within hours or days, 41 studies confirm the opposite: the spike protein and vaccine mRNA persist in human tissues for weeks, months, or years, sometimes far longer than the virus itself.

Some scientists now warn that long-term risks remain totally unassessed.

IV. Lipid Nanoparticle Toxicity — 80 Studies

The injections use lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) to deliver the mRNA payload, but 80 peer-reviewed studies show those LNPs are not inert.

In fact, they’re highly inflammatory and often include polyethylene glycol (PEG), which is known to cause anaphylaxis in some patients.

These nanoparticles may trigger immune dysfunction, inflammation, and allergic reactions, yet public health regulators have never fully addressed the danger.

V. Immune System Imprinting — 140 Studies

One of the most disturbing revelations comes from 140 studies on immune imprinting, a phenomenon where the body’s immune response becomes “locked in” to the original virus strain it encountered.

Known as “original antigenic sin,” this means that mRNA shots based on the Wuhan strain may have blunted recipients’ immune responses to newer variants, making them more vulnerable, not less.

VI. Vaccine-Driven Variants — 70 Studies

Finally, 70 peer-reviewed papers support what many experts have long been warning: mRNA vaccines placed evolutionary pressure on the virus, helping to accelerate the emergence of vaccine-resistant variants.

This scientific consensus completely undermines the claim that mass vaccination campaigns helped end the pandemic.

In fact, they may have prolonged and worsened it.

With over 700 peer-reviewed papers now published, it’s no longer credible for government health agencies to claim they “need more data” on vaccine safety.

The data is here and it’s damning.

Public health authorities, regulatory agencies, and corporate media have ignored, suppressed, and dismissed these warnings for years.

Millions were coerced, fired, deplatformed, or ostracized for simply pointing to the same facts these studies confirm.

Yet, despite the growing body of scientific evidence, so-called “fact-checkers” – failed left-wing “journalists” and fake “scientists” – continue to smear those who raise questions as “conspiracy theories” or “anti-vaxxers” while shutting down concerns about “vaccine” safety as “disinformation.”

We were told to “trust the science.”

The question now is: Will they?