A Pfizer scientist has admitted that the pharmaceutical giant delayed the announcement of its Covid mRNA “vaccine” in order to hurt President Donald Trump and help the Democrats in the 2020 presidential election.
Dr. Philip Dormitzer, Pfizer’s Global Head of Vaccines Research and Development, admitted that “it wasn’t a coincidence” that the company waited until shortly after the 2020 election to announce its experimental injection.
Dormitzer suggested that the “vaccine” was ready before Americans cast votes in 2020, but Pfizer believed the news would help Trump on Election Day.
Instead, Pfizer chose to delay the news in the hope that their preferred candidates, former President Joe Biden, would “win.”
Dormitzer’s revelations may have been part of an effort by senior Pfizer executives to “deliberately slow down” the testing shots, according to bombshell findings from a House Judiciary Committee investigation.
The House Judiciary Committee believes that Dormitzer and other Pfizer executives conspired to affect the 2020 presidential election.
According to a letter provided to the committee by drugmaker GSK, Dormitzer apparently asked to be relocated from the US to Canada.
When Dormitzer was asked why he wanted to transfer, he said he was worried he “could be investigated by the incoming Trump Administration over his role in developing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.”
Pfizer’s HR team responded by asking Dormitzer why he would be investigated, to which he apparently said:
“Let’s just say it wasn’t a coincidence, the timing of the vaccine.”
According to the HR rep, the ex-Pfizer “vaccine” scientist was “visibly upset” in the meeting.
Pfizer broadcast the results of its vaccine trials five days after polls closed in the 2020 election.
The letter also claimed some of its employees were told by Dormitzer that “in late 2020, the three most senior people in Pfizer R&D were involved in a decision to deliberately slow down clinical testing so that it would not be complete prior to the results of the presidential election that year.”
The Judiciary Committee sent letters to Dormitzer and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla demanding all records showing data from the clinical trials or communications with public-health agencies.
“This new information appears to suggest that you and other senior Pfizer executives conspired to withhold public health information to influence the 2020 presidential election,” Jordan wrote to Dormitzer.
“Due to the seriousness of these allegations, the Committee is compelled to request additional information to inform our oversight.”
The panel has also demanded that Dormitzer schedule an interview with them before 29 May.
Dormitzer has publicly denied that he or anyone else at Pfizer deliberately delayed the company’s “vaccine.”
However, federal election campaign filings show that Dormitzer has only contributed to Democrat campaigns.
He gave hundreds of dollars to congressional candidates in the 2010s while working in vaccine development at Novartis.
His comments to GSK employees were first made in the course of a federal probe by Manhattan prosecutors.
The comments, along with the Judiciary letters, were first reported by The Wall Street Journal.
Dormitzer claims that his comments had been misinterpreted.
“My Pfizer colleagues and I did everything we could to get the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization at the very first possible moment,” Dormitzer previously told Reuters in a statement amid the investigation by the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York.
“Any other interpretation of my comments about the pace of the vaccine’s development would be incorrect.”
In a statement, Pfizer said:
“Pfizer is in receipt of the letter asking about allegations made in a Wall Street Journal story, and we will respond directly to the Committee.”
