In a bone-chilling new development, scientists have just reintroduced the pneumonic plague, one of the most deadly diseases known to humankind, in order to develop a novel bivalent mRNA “vaccine” to supposedly tackle the virus.
During biolab experiments, a group of Israeli scientists used Yersinia pestis, the causative agent of plague, to further develop the controversial lipid nanoparticle (LNP) platform.
The study titled “Novel Bivalent mRNA-LNP Vaccine for Highly Effective Protection against Pneumonic Plague” raises serious ethical and safety concerns.
Critics are accusing researchers of playing with fire in the name of technological advancement.
The study was led by Dr. Uri Elia of the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics at the Israel Institute for Biological Research.
The results of the study were published in the research journal Advanced Science.
The scientists argue that this new “vaccine” technology aims to protect against Yersinia pestis, the bacterium that causes pneumonic plague.
However, this research is not only unnecessary but highly dangerous.
Researchers have purposefully reintroduced a pathogen responsible for some of the most devastating outbreaks in human history, so they can advance mRNA technology.
While the researchers may claim that this “vaccine” holds potential for addressing global health threats, it comes at a much higher price: the risks of unleashing an even deadlier virus in the name of “progress.”
The most shocking aspect of the study is that scientists have deliberately worked with Yersinia pestis, the very bacterium responsible for the historic plague outbreaks that have wiped out millions of people.
Despite the availability of modern medical tools to combat the disease, these scientists have resurrected the pathogen to fuel their experiment with mRNA-LNP vaccines.
This dangerous experiment not only brings back a deadly virus, but it also opens the door to the potential misuse of this technology in the future.
The goal of the researchers was to create a vaccine against pneumonic plague using the same mRNA-LNP technology that powered the controversial Covid vaccines.
However, there is little regard for the potential biological hazards this technology could bring.
The researchers insist that the “vaccine” provides effective protection against the plague.
Yet, it also exposes the public to unknown risks, including the possibility of accidental release of the pathogens during experimentation or further destabilization of the virus itself in future trials.
The lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used in this vaccine to deliver the mRNA into human cells have already raised red flags for their potential toxicity.
Despite claims of the technology’s success, the study found evidence of inflammation and toxicity in tissues, suggesting that these nanoparticles could have severe and long-lasting effects on the human body.
The rush to develop these technologies without fully understanding their risks is reckless, especially when dealing with such dangerous pathogens.
The researchers’ decision to revive a disease with such devastating potential raises serious ethical concerns.
Critics argue that experimenting with deadly pathogens in the name of technological advancement is not only irresponsible but also an invitation to potential disaster.
The decision to manipulate Yersinia pestis in this manner reflects a broader trend of scientific overreach, where the pursuit of groundbreaking technologies comes at the expense of public safety.
The government’s role in allowing such experiments to take place without full accountability is another source of concern.
Health authorities have largely stood by as these dangerous experiments unfold, with little oversight to ensure that these innovations don’t spiral out of control.
The rapid rollout of mRNA-based injections during the Covid pandemic should serve as a warning: the government has already failed to protect the public when it comes to fast-tracked vaccine technology.
Allowing scientists to continue down this risky path without proper safeguards could put everyone at risk.
The rush to develop new mRNA “vaccines” raises serious doubts about the priorities of both the scientific community and regulatory agencies, especially when the technology is being applied to high-risk pathogens that have previously been eliminated.
Rather than focusing on preventing known diseases, scientists seem more interested in pushing the boundaries of what’s possible with mRNA technology, regardless of the potential consequences.
This study represents a chilling example of scientific ambition gone unchecked.
The desire to defend against pandemics is understandable, but when it leads to the deliberate reintroduction of deadly viruses and the creation of new technologies with uncertain risks, the potential for harm far outweighs any perceived benefit.
The findings of this study should serve as a wake-up call.
The deliberate reintroduction of dangerous pathogens like Yersinia pestis under the guise of medical innovation not only endangers public health but also exposes the reckless drive for technological advancement at any cost.
The rush to develop mRNA “vaccines,” without fully understanding the long-term risks or consequences, could lead to disastrous outcomes, especially when scientists have shown they are willing to manipulate the deadliest diseases on Earth.
The public must demand accountability from the scientific community and government regulators.
The ethical implications of such experiments cannot be ignored, and the safety of the global population should not be sacrificed in the name of progress.
It’s time to put the brakes on the reckless pursuit of unproven technologies and ensure that all new medical treatments undergo rigorous testing and oversight before they are deployed on a global scale.
Our comment section is restricted to members of the Slay News community only.
To join, create a free account HERE.
If you are already a member, log in HERE.