A Texas jury has awarded $3.2 million to Asher Vann after concluding that false accusations of racially motivated bullying devastated his adolescence, invaded his privacy, and caused severe emotional distress.
Vann, now a college freshman, was never charged with a crime, and police investigations at the time produced no arrests.
Yet the allegations spread rapidly across social media and national media in 2021, triggering protests, public condemnation, and calls for his expulsion from school.
Five years later, a jury rejected the narrative that had defined his teenage years.
The 2021 Allegations and Their Fallout
The case stems from a 2021 sleepover in which a classmate, then-13-year-old SeMarion Humphrey, accused Vann and several other boys of shooting him with a BB gun and forcing him to drink urine, claims widely framed online as race-based bullying.
The story quickly gained national attention.
Demonstrators appeared in the Vann family’s neighborhood, activists demanded school discipline, and the family faced intense public scrutiny despite the absence of criminal charges.
Law enforcement declined to pursue the case.
Now, a civil jury has concluded the accusations caused profound harm.
Vann’s Account of What Happened
Speaking on Fox News’s The Will Cain Show alongside his father, Aaron Vann, Asher Vann described the sleepover in terms far removed from the narrative that circulated publicly.
“We went hunting for frogs,” he said.
“We had big jackets on, so dumb kids, we each took shots at each other like a Nerf war, except with airsoft guns.
“Then after, he fell asleep, and way before that, we all agreed, whoever falls asleep first gets pranked, and he got pranked, and it was nasty, but it was not like this big racial torture that it was played out to be.”
Authorities never treated the incident as a hate crime, and prosecutors did not file charges.
The jury ultimately reached the same conclusion about the broader allegations.
A Family Targeted
Aaron Vann described how quickly his family became the focus of national outrage.
“Everything’s happening all at once. You don’t know what to do. You go into immediate protection mode and protecting your family.”
He said the family resisted responding through social media despite the pressure.
“I wanted to get our story up, but I knew that there was a way to do that in an appropriate manner that wasn’t trial by social media.”
That decision meant waiting years for resolution in court rather than the court of public opinion.
The Jury’s Verdict
Attorney Justin Nichols emphasized the jury’s diversity, five African American jurors, three Asian jurors, two Latino jurors, and the remaining jurors were Caucasian, arguing the composition underscored that the verdict rested on evidence rather than racial alignment.
Nichols said the defendant continued advancing a narrative the jury ultimately rejected:
“This is emblematic of somebody who continues to refuse to accept responsibility throughout the case, throughout their depositions, and even on the stand.
“They continued to push this false narrative of racism that they know did not exist, that was untrue, and they continue to double down instead of finally taking some responsibility for hurting so many lives.”
Summer Smith, Humphrey’s mother, said the ruling would be appealed and noted the legal claims involved intentional infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy rather than defamation.
She said she remains “steadfast” in seeking justice for her son.
Broader Questions About Media and Social Narratives
The case highlights how rapidly allegations, particularly those involving race, can spread through social media and national coverage before facts are fully established.
In Vann’s situation, police declined to prosecute, yet the public narrative persisted for years.
By the time the civil verdict arrived, much of the reputational damage had already been done.
Reflecting on the outcome, Vann told Will Cain:
“I don’t feel so scared and so little as I did back then. I feel like I’m getting heard.”
What Comes Next
Smith has pledged to appeal the verdict.
Still, the underlying facts remain unchanged: no criminal charges were filed, no arrests were made, and a jury determined the accusations inflicted severe harm.
Vann, now beginning college, cannot recover the years lost to public condemnation.
But the verdict marks a formal clearing of his name after a five-year legal and personal battle.
Our comment section is restricted to members of the Slay News community only.
To join, create a free account HERE.
If you are already a member, log in HERE.