UK Lawmakers Push to Mandate Surveillance Tracking on All Smartphones for ‘Child Safety’

Privacy advocates are sounding the alarm over the most sweeping attempt at digital control ever proposed in a Western democracy, as UK lawmakers advance plans to roll out an unprecedented public monitoring program under the guise of “protecting children’s well-being.”

A new set of amendments quietly slipped into the United Kingdom’s Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill would force nearly all smartphones and tablets sold in the country to come preloaded with tamper-proof government-mandated surveillance software.

Under the legislation, the monitoring cannot be removed, disabled, or opted out of.

The proposals appear under a deceptively benign section titled “Action to promote the well-being of children by combating child sexual abuse material (CSAM).”

But the text reveals an unprecedented expansion of state power over private devices.

The amendment requires that any “relevant device supplied for use in the UK must have installed tamper-proof system software which is highly effective at preventing the recording, transmitting (by any means, including livestreaming) and viewing of CSAM using that device.”

In other words, the only way such a system can function is by scanning every single photo, video, livestream, and file on a user’s device, continuously, in the background, without consent.

Manufacturers, importers, and distributors would be legally required to ensure all internet-connected smartphones and tablets comply.

Enforcement would occur “as if the CSAM requirement was a security requirement for the purposes of Part 1 of the Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Act 2022.”

In other words, this is client-side scanning on a national scale.

This government-mandated surveillance apparatus will be built into the operating system of every single personal device used by the general public.

A System That Must Scan Everything

To “prevent the recording, transmitting … and viewing” of illegal content, software must analyze all content, including encrypted photos, private videos, and messages never shared with anyone.

There is no technological workaround.

The proposal functionally demands:

• Always-on device monitoring
• Automated classification of private content
• The erosion of end-to-end encryption
• No ability for the user to disable or refuse the scanning

This is not a parental-control tool, however.

It is an inspection system that treats every citizen’s device as a potential crime scene.

And real-world data shows how flawed such systems already are.

In 2024, German authorities reported that nearly 50 percent, 99,375 out of 205,728, of all CSAM “tips” forwarded to them, from the U.S.-based National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), were false positives.

Those scans came from companies like Meta, Microsoft, and Google under the existing “Chat Control 1.0” model.

Now imagine error-prone scanning not just on messages sent across a platform, but on every file on your phone.

A Surveillance Framework Far Beyond “Child Protection”

The same bill contains additional amendments that quietly erect an interconnected digital-identity regime for minors:

• Pages 19–20: VPN providers must apply “age assurance” to determine if a user is a child, effectively forcing identity verification for all users to access privacy tools.

• Page 21: All regulated social media platforms must impose “highly-effective age assurance measures” to block under-16s entirely.

Combined with mandatory device-level scanning, this forms the legal groundwork for a fully monitored, fully verified, fully trackable digital environment.

While marketed as “protecting children,” these measures redefine privacy as a conditional privilege that exists only if the state allows it.

A System Built for Expansion

Unlike the EU’s controversial “Chat Control” plan, which would scan communications as they pass through messaging platforms, the UK proposal goes much further.

This would embed scanning directly into every personal device, meaning the government (and any future leadership) would already have the legal and technical infrastructure needed to analyze:

• Political content
• Medical information
• Religious material
• Private messages
• Encrypted communications
• Personal photos stored offline

Once the architecture is in place, expanding the categories of “prohibited” material becomes as simple as changing a definition.

Surveillance Creep in the UK Is Accelerating

This proposal is not emerging in a vacuum.

The UK is already:

• Arresting people for online posts and private messages
• Rolling out real-time facial recognition across cities
• Expanding speech-policing powers under vague “harmful content” standards
• Sharing data across government agencies with little transparency

Now lawmakers want the power to examine your personal photos and videos before you even send them.

A democratic nation is openly considering turning every phone and tablet into a permanent government-approved scanning device, all under the banner of “children’s well-being.”

The only thing standing between the British public and a full-scale, baked-in surveillance state is whether socialist Labour Party-controlled Parliament approves this amendment.

READ MORE – UK Government Launches New Effort to Crack Down on Public’s ‘Emotions’