Wisconsin Election Chief Hit with Articles of Impeachment

Wisconsin’s embattled election chief Meagan Wolfe has been accused of maladministration in office and faces impeachment.

Wolfe, the administrator of the Wisconsin Election Commission (WEC), is now facing removal from her position.

On September 21, five Republican state assembly members presented both houses of the Legislature with a 23-page resolution containing 15 articles of impeachment against Wolfe.

The articles accuse Wolfe of maladministration in office.

Lawmakers allege that Wolfe, who oversaw the state’s 2020 presidential election, either created or implemented a string of policies and practices that run contrary to state law.

Since the 2020 presidential election, several actions by the WEC under Wolfe’s guidance have been declared illegal by Wisconsin courts.

Cosponsors of the resolution are Republican Reps. Janel Brandtjen, Scott Allen, Elijah Behnke, Ty Bodden, and Chuck Wichgers.

Some Republicans believe Wolfe’s policies and directives have favored the Democrats.

They argue that her efforts to help Democrats cost President Donald Trump the Badger State’s 10 electoral votes in the hotly contested 2020 election.

On Jan. 6, 2021, Congress acknowledged the WEC’s tally.

The tally showed that President Trump had lost Wisconsin to Democrat Joe Biden by fewer than 21,000 votes.

Slay the latest News for free!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Within hours of the filing of the resolution, Wolfe issued a statement responding to the charges.

She claims the allegations “misrepresent my actions and how this agency works.”

Wolfe has consistently maintained that she is not a policymaker and has done nothing but follow WEC’s orders.

However, critics assert that this attempt to pass the buck runs contrary to the state law creating the Wisconsin Election Commission.

The law reads in pertinent part:

“The election commission shall be under the direction and supervision of an administrator who shall be appointed by a majority of the members of the commission.”

However, Wolfe insists that “Every major decision relating to the 2020 election was made by the agency’s six bipartisan commissioners in public meetings.”

In her response, she disputed the veracity of the claims made in the resolution, pointing out that numerous investigations have shown that “Wisconsin’s elections are run with integrity.”

“It’s irresponsible for this group of politicians to willfully distort the truth,” she said.

Nevertheless, Wolfe claims the attempt at impeachment is “unlikely to succeed.”

Meanwhile, Wolfe has urged election officials to start preparing for the critical 2024 presidential election.

She said earlier, that she intends to manage the next election despite a lack of Republican support for her to continue on in what they say should be a non-partisan position.

Some of the allegations against Wolfe contained in the articles include her allowing outside forces to corrupt the election process.

She welcomed election workers and even employees of non-profit organizations to play an active role in “correcting” omissions and errors on mail-in voting ballots.

However, Wisconsin law specifically mandates that voters do their own corrections.

Another article alleges that Wolfe failed to create an effective verification system capable of preventing bad actors from filing numerous absentee ballot applications and receiving ballots in other people’s names at different addresses.

Real-life examples of such occurrences were included in the resolution.

“When a lawsuit sought declaratory and injunctive relief to compel Administrator Wolfe to address this dereliction, she engaged the services of a private law firm, the Mark Elias Group, in an attempt to avoid remedying the situation,” the resolution said.

Mark Elias, a former Hillary Clinton campaign attorney, is a top election strategist for the national Democrat Party.

The funding for the operation came from grant money awarded to localities by the Mark Zuckerberg-supported left-leaning NGO Chicago-based Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL).

The stated aim of the grants was to help communities conduct “safe elections” during the pandemic.

Wisconsin’s five largest cities; Milwaukee, Madison, Racine, Kenosha, and Green Bay, received grant payments totaling $8.8 million.

That represented 86 percent of the total CTCL grant funds awarded in Wisconsin.

The remaining 14 percent was divided between smaller jurisdictions throughout the state.

As post-election expenditure reports submitted to Wolfe by the five cities showed, very few grant dollars were spent on plexiglass shields and personal protection equipment (PPE) for clerks and poll workers.

Green Bay, for example, reported spending only one percent of its grant award on PPE.

The five cities were criticized in the articles for their “lack of transparency in the financial reporting.”

The resolution raised the question of whether the vast majority of the funds were used “to promote voter turnout among specific demographic groups favored by partisan actors.”

According to Article 11, Wolfe told a legislative hearing that she was not even aware of the CTCL grant funding until she learned of it from a city’s financial report on August 30, 2020.

The resolution asserts that this contention “strains credibility.”

To receive a grant, municipal election officials agreed by contract to install absentee ballot drop boxes, “cooperate with CTCL directives, and follow the instructions of CTCL’s designated personnel in administering the elections,” alleges the resolution.

According to the resolution, Wolfe’s mishandling of absentee ballot applications “paralleled her maladministration of absentee ballot returns.”

After the 2020 presidential election, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that the state election law does not allow agents or anyone other than the elector to submit an elector’s absentee ballot directly to a clerk’s office and that a person-to-person exchange between the elector and the clerk, or clerk’s authorized representative was required.

“Therefore, Administrator Wolfe’s memos advising otherwise conflicted with the law and were rightly void,” the resolution said.

The articles also allege that Wolfe allowed the potential circumventing of Wisconsin’s proof of identification laws.

People were able to vote without ID through the WisVote online absentee ballot request form.

The WEC lacked the legal authority to establish the WisVote system.

The resolution asserts, “The underlying issue lies in mailing absentee ballots without proof of identification.”

They also point out that WEC has no legal authority to receive absentee ballot applications.

By law, these applications are required to be submitted to the municipal clerk.

An intermediary such as WEC is not one of the six statutorily specified methods to obtain an absentee ballot, according to the resolution.

Outlined in Article 14 is the failure by Wolfe to remove ineligible names from the state voter roll.

According to WEC’s own figures, the state of Wisconsin has 4.5 million voting-age people residing there.

However, there are 7.1 million names on the state voter roll.

Under Wolfe’s leadership, the article alleges that “names are never removed from the voter roll, even in cases of individuals who have passed away.

“Rather than designating these deceased individuals as ‘ineligible’ voters, as the statute would dictate, Administrator Wolfe categorizes them as ‘inactive’ voters, thereby allowing their names to persist on the voter roll.

“At best, this practice of retaining deceased individuals on the voter roll needlessly complicates the list, making it more challenging for auditors.

“At worst, it provides a reservoir of names that can be ‘activated’ two weeks before an election and ‘deactivated’ two weeks after by anyone with access to the WisVote system.

“This process operates in a manner that conceals the identities of both the ‘activator’ and the ‘deactivator.’

“Administrator Wolfe’s oversight of this problematic system is unacceptable,” according to the resolution.

READ MORE: Jack Smith’s Gag Order Would Block Trump from Criticizing Biden during Election, Experts Warn

SHARE:
join telegram

READERS' POLL

Who is the best president?

By completing this poll, you gain access to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.

By David Lindfield
Subscribe
Notify of

Recommended

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x