Climate change activists Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were flown to New York in their private jet before being whisked away in a gas-guzzling luxury SUV to collect an “anti-racism” award at an exclusive event.
The “woke” couple arrived in NYC on Monday for the elitist Ripple of Hope gala on Tuesday.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex were safe in the knowledge that they wouldn’t come into close contact with any peasants during their trip as tickets for the VIP-only event were selling for up to $1 million a pop.
Harry and Meghan were celebrated for their “human rights” efforts at the gala that was also giving a “sustainability” award.
This is the second such trip in the space of one week for the jet-setting pair.
Last week, Markle arrived in Indianapolis via private jet to pick up a “female empowerment award.”
Harry and Meghan continue to enjoy their opulent lifestyle while lecturing the public about their carbon footprint.
The pair previously “saved the planet” by taking a private jet to attend a celebrity climate change conference in Sicily in 2019.
Indeed, Harry and Meghan took no fewer than four private jet trips in the space of just eleven days in the same year.
Harry previously gave a speech about global warming at the UN declaring “our world is on fire” and that the “crisis will only grow worse.”
Apparently, the “crisis” has not reached the point where Harry and Meghan will have to give up their $6.5 million dollar luxury Cessna 680 Citation Sovereign private jet.
According to the Independent, last year, the couple’s non-profit Archwell “issued a net-zero plan which said the organization is committed to reaching net-zero carbon emissions by 2030.”
Presumably, “reaching net-zero carbon emissions” doesn’t include cutting the carbon emissions being pumped out by their private jet.
The Duke and Duchess were given the Ripple of Hope award in New York alongside Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Ostensibly, the award was for their “heroic” stance against the “structural racism” of the Royal Family.
However, the so-called stance involved claiming, with no actual evidence, that an unnamed senior royal had expressed racist sentiments about their newborn baby.
