Calls are mounting for a criminal investigation to be launched into the shady deal between the president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla.
As Slay News reported, it recently emerged that von der Leyen and Bourla secretly cut a massive multi-billion dollar deal to purchase Pfizer vaccines.
The deal provoked a widespread backlash after it was revealed that the taxpayer-funded deal paid for 4.5 billion doses of vaccines for the EU’s 450 million citizens.
As many have pointed out, the deal secured a staggering ten doses for every man, woman, and child in the European Union, including babies.
EU Parliamentarian Christine Anderson is now demanding a criminal investigation into von der Leyen’s role in the deal.
She is calling for a parliamentary investigative committee to be assembled.
The calls follow the recent bombshell admission from Pfizer that their vaccines were never tested against preventing transmission of COVID-19.
As Slay News reported, conservative Dutch MEP Rob Roos has been raising the alarm about the revelation.
Pfizer executive Janine Small made the admission under oath during questioning from Roos at an EU hearing.
“Was the Pfizer Covid vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market?” Roos asked Small.
“If not, please, say it clearly. If ‘yes’ are you willing to share the data with this committee?
“And I really want a straight answer, ‘yes or no’ and I’m looking forward to it.”
Responding to Roos’ questions, Small answered “No.
“We had to really move at the speed of science.”
A #Pfizer representative admitted to me that the #vaccine had never been tested on stopping transmission. I joined @RowanDean (@SkyNewsAust) to discuss the implications of this admission. Now, we need #accountability.
I also respond to accusations by so-called "fact checkers": pic.twitter.com/PdlLefut06
— Rob Roos MEP 🇳🇱 (@Rob_Roos) October 24, 2022
Now, the European Public Prosecutor’s Office has opened an investigation into the EU’s coronavirus vaccine purchases.
As Politico reports:
“In April 2021, the New York Times first reported on text messages exchanged between von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla in the run-up to the EU’s biggest vaccine procurement contract — for up to 1.8 billion doses of BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine.
“The deal would be worth up to €35 billion if fully exercised, according to leaked vaccine prices.”
Unelected EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen earned the nickname “Von der Lying” in the UK press in the Spring of 2021.
She earned the moniker over disparaging remarks about the British “Oxford jab,” the AstraZeneca vaccine.
Now her deleted text messages with Bourla may be subject to a criminal investigation.
“In January this year, the EU’s ombudsman charged the Commission with maladministration for failing to look for the text messages in response to a freedom of information request,” Politico notes.
“Without confirming the existence of the texts, the Commission argued in its response that ‘short-lived, ephemeral documents are not kept’.”
Speaking in Brussels on October 20, MEP Christine Anderson (Identity & Democracy group) said that “it was a gigantic lie that these vaccines would prevent you from catching this virus or prevent transmission.
“None of that was true, as it turns out.
“All of the mandates, all of the lockdowns, wearing masks, staying at home, curfews, all of it, was based on that gigantic lie.”
Why is this not on the news? The media is completely complicit in this – there’s no confusing that now. pic.twitter.com/3vvSOnxxUl
— WAKE UP #WeThePeople 💥👏 (@LetsGoBrando45) October 20, 2022
The EU now wants to “increase vaccine confidence” by “debunking mis- and disinformation,” Anderson said.
“Who is spreading mis- and disinformation?
“It is the EU Commission, it is the pharmaceutical companies, it is governments, especially in the Western democracies.
“They are the ones spreading the mis- and disinformation.
“They are the ones telling lies.
“And for what? So the pharmaceutical companies make profits, and profits, and profits.
“And the risks? Guess what? You, the taxpayers will be left with the risks.”