Dinesh D’Souza Challenges Bill Barr to Debate over Election Fraud Claims in ‘2000 Mules’

Celebrated filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza has thrown down the gauntlet to former Attorney General William Barr and challenged him to a debate over claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election.

D’Souza’s documentary “2000 Mules” questions the integrity of the 2020 general election and the filmmaker wants to debate the film’s findings with Barr.

D’Souza threw down the challenge after Barr laughed when referring to the movie during a recorded deposition.

The deposition was aired by the anti-Trump House January 6 committee during the televised hearings on Monday.

“My opinion then, and my opinion now, is that the election was not stolen by fraud,” Barr said.

“And I haven’t seen anything since the election that changes my mind, including the ‘2000 Mules’ movie,” he added before starting to laugh.

Committee member Democratic Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) asked Barr to provide his assessment of the documentary.

Barr responded that the Georgia Bureau of Investigation had looked into the cellphone geo-tracking evidence used in “2000 Mules” by the vote integrity group True the Vote and was “unimpressed with it.”

True the Vote partnered with D’Souza in making “2000 Mules.”

GBI Director D. Victor Reynolds wrote in a September letter to the chairman of the Georgia Republican Party David Shafer and True the Vote’s Gregg Phillips that the cellphone data True the Vote offered “while curious, does not rise to the level of probable cause that a crime has been committed.”

Barr was more dismissive in his review.

Slay the latest News for free!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

“The cellphone data is singularly unimpressive,” he said during the deposition, as the Washington Examiner reported.

“I mean, basically, if you take two million cellphones and figure out where they are in a big city like Atlanta or wherever, just by definition you are going to find that many hundreds of them have passed by and spent time in the vicinity of these boxes.”

“And the premise if you go by five boxes or whatever it was that that’s a mule is just indefensible,” Barr concluded.

D’Souza responded in a series of tweets, including one that called on Barr to debate him.

“I’d like to invite Bill Barr to a public debate on election fraud,” D’Souza said.

“Given his blithe chuckling dismissal of #2000Mules this should be easy for him.

“What do you say, Barr?

“Do you dare to back up your belly laughs with arguments that can withstand rebuttal and cross-examination?”

The central premise of the documentary is that an illegal ballot harvesting scheme took place in the key swing states of Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin during the 2020 general election.

A “mule” is a term used in the movie for those who were allegedly paid to repeatedly pick up batches of ballots and place them in drop boxes.

On May 31, True the Vote’s Catherine Engelbrecht and Phillips testified before a group of Arizona Republican state senators that they used cellphone geo-tracking data to identify people who made 10 or more drop box stops along with five or more visits to non-governmental organizations working on voter turnout during the 2020 general election.

Engelbrecht told lawmakers True the Vote’s “mule” threshold was very high.

“We wanted to focus on a very clear, narrow data set that showed what we would consider this extreme outlier behavior, and ultimately we settled on 10 times,” she said.

“The devices that we focused in on went to drop boxes 10 or more times.

“And here in Arizona they went an average of 21 times,” Engelbrecht added.

The Associated Press fact-checked “2000 Mules,” claiming True the Vote’s analysis was “flawed” based on false assumptions of how precise cellphone tracking data is, based on the fact people might frequently happen to go by drop boxes for other reasons, and based on the premise that others had business being there, such as election workers.

D’Souza made clear in a Monday Twitter post that for a mule to be counted in their analysis, he or she had to go to 10 different drop boxes during the election cycle, seemingly making it very unlikely their conduct was just coincidence.

“Is there anyone competent in cell phone geotracking who will defend what Bill Barr said?” the conservative commentator wrote.

“He insists that random people in a busy city going past ballot dropboxes cannot be distinguished from mules who each go on routes and stop specifically at 10 or more dropboxes. Is this true?”

To further guard against accidentally picking up those who happened to pass by drop box locations regularly, True the Vote bought cellphone data from September, October, and November, showing before, during, and after the election.

Only those who had cellphones that placed them at drop boxes when voting was occurring were included in True the Vote’s data, the group said.

In addition to cellphone data, Phillips said in “2000 Mules” that his group has 4 million minutes of surveillance footage from drop boxes it obtained through public records requests, allegedly showing the mules in action.

The footage is shown in the movie of alleged mules taking pictures of the drop boxes and delivering multiple ballots at one time.

Advertise with Slay News
join telegram


Who is the best president?

By completing this poll, you gain access to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.

By Frank Bergman

Frank Bergman is a political/economic journalist living on the east coast. Aside from news reporting, Bergman also conducts interviews with researchers and material experts and investigates influential individuals and organizations in the sociopolitical world.

Notify of
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x