Federal Appeals Court Backs Democrats, Rules Trump ‘Not Immune’ to Jan 6 Civil Lawsuits

A federal appeals court has backed the Democrats by ruling that President Donald Trump is “not immune” to facing lawsuits related to the protests at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

The Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Sri Srinivasan wrote in a filing that Trump could be liable for “damages” stemming from Jan. 6-related lawsuits.

Judge Srinivasan wrote that Capitol Police officers and members of Congress who were at the U.S. Capitol that day have submitted cases seeking civil “damages” from Trump.

Those lawsuits, with the sole defendant being named as Trump, are seeking “damages” for “harms they allege they suffered arising from the riot,” the judge revealed.

“According to the plaintiffs, President Trump’s actions, including ultimately his speech on January 6, sparked the ensuing riot at the Capitol,” he said.

Srinivasan, who is part of a three-judge panel, said Trump has moved in the district court to dismiss the claims against him.

Trump’s arguments include “on grounds of a President’s official-act immunity from damages liability,” Srinivasan wrote.

“The district court largely rejected his claim of immunity, and President Trump now appeals,” he continued.

“The sole issue before us is whether President Trump has demonstrated an entitlement to official-act immunity for his actions leading up to and on January 6 as alleged in the complaints.

“We answer no, at least at this state of the proceedings.”

Srinivasan said that “since the Supreme Court’s decision in Nixon v. Fitzgerald, Presidents have carried out their official responsibilities free from any exposure to civil damages liability” and that decision “established a President’s absolute immunity from civil damages claims predicated on his official acts.”

But he continued by saying that “the President, though, does not spend every minute of every day exercising official responsibilities.”

“When he acts outside the functions of his office, he does not continue to enjoy immunity from damages liability just because he happens to be the President.”

Slay the latest News for free!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

“When he acts in an unofficial, private capacity, he is subject to civil suits like any private citizen,” Srinivasan said.

He explained that when a “first-term President opts to seek a second term, his campaign to win re-election is not an official presidential act.”

Srinivasan also wrote that “in arguing that he is entitled to official-act immunity in the cases before us, President Trump does not dispute that he engaged in his alleged actions up to and on January 6 in his capacity as a candidate.

“But he thinks that does not matter.”

“Rather, in his view, a President’s speech on matters of public concern is invariably an official function, and he was engaged in that function when he spoke at the January 6 rally and in the leadup to that day,” he concluded.

“We cannot accept that rationale.”

READ MORE: NY AG Letitia James Responds after Deutsche Bank Testimony Sinks Her Get-Trump Case

SHARE:
join telegram

READERS' POLL

Who is the best president?

By completing this poll, you gain access to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.

By Frank Bergman

Frank Bergman is a political/economic journalist living on the east coast. Aside from news reporting, Bergman also conducts interviews with researchers and material experts and investigates influential individuals and organizations in the sociopolitical world.

Subscribe
Notify of

Recommended

4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x