A U.S. federal judge has finally set the record straight by ruling that human gender can only be either male or female.
The ruling comes after the Democrats have increasingly pushed that sex is something fluid that can be changed at will.
This push has led to the dilution of what it means to be male or female as men claim to be “women” and vice versa.
In addition, real women are being punished for being proud of their own female identity.
This radical ideology not only defies sanity but it completely ignores the fact that it is scientifically impossible for a person to change their gender.
Human sex is defined at the chromosomal level and no amount of surgery, drugs, or false pronouns can ever change that.
Nevertheless, the Democrats and President Joe Biden’s administration insist that “gender” and “sex” actually mean “sexual orientation” or “gender identity” and can be changed.
By confusing “sexual orientation” with “sex,” Biden claims “gender” manipulation is something that has been “protected” in federal law for decades.
As a result, this radical ideology has been forced onto churches, foster parents, adoptive families, schools, and many others.
However, this agenda has now just hit a major obstacle in the form of a federal judge.
In the U.S. district court in northern Texas, Judge Reed O’Connor issued a ruling in a battle over Biden’s agenda.
O’Connor concluded that, when a 1972 law refers to “sex,” it carries “an unambiguously binary meaning.”
The Post-Millennial reported on the decision in Texas’ lawsuit against Biden over his “guidance” on Title IX.
That law essentially rules that males and females should be treated equally in schools.
Biden demanded through his redefinitions that the 1972 law actually meant “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” when it was originally written.
However, “gender identity” was unheard of in the 1970s and is something that has only emerged in recent years.
Biden’s goal was to remove standards in schools that limited male students, in intimate situations such as locker rooms, to be with other boys, and girls with girls.
The Texas case was against Biden’s Department of Education (DOE) and the Department of Justice (DOJ).
The case also named DOE Secretary Miguel Cardona and Attorney General Merrick Garland.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton told the court that Biden’s changes were “not in accordance with law and are in excess of statutory authority because they rely upon the interpretation of Title VII described in Bostock and apply it to Title IX.”
Judge O’Connor took Texas’s side in the case, ruling:
“Because of this prohibition on sex discrimination, recipients of federal funds generally cannot discriminate based on someone’s sex.
“However, nothing in the statute expressly prohibits discrimination based on gender identity or other unexpressed grounds.
“And where Title IX allows for differentiation based on sex due to biological differences—such as intimate facilities and athletic teams—recipients may treat persons in accordance with their biological sex without regard to subjective gender identity.”
He explained an investigation into contemporary dictionaries “does not support” the radical claims pushed by Biden and the Democrats.
“Title IX explicitly appreciates the innate biological variation between men and women that occasionally warrants differentiation—and even separation—to preserve educational opportunities and to promote respect for both sexes,” the judge said.
“Rather than promote the equal opportunity, dignity, and respect that Title IX demands for both biological sexes, Defendants’ Guidance Documents do the opposite in an effort to advance an agenda wholly divorced from the text, structure, and contemporary context of Title IX.”
The judge continued, “Not to mention, recipients of Title IX funding—including Texas schools—will face an impossible choice: revise policies in compliance with the Guidance Documents but in contravention of state law or face the loss of substantial funding.
“Thus, to allow Defendants’ unlawful action to stand would be to functionally rewrite Title IX in a way that shockingly transforms American education and usurps a major question from Congress.
“That is not how our democratic system functions.”
Paxton said his state “prevailed on behalf of the entire nation.”
READ MORE – Biden Officials Push for Age Limit for Child Gender Surgeries to Be Reduced
