Kansas Uncovers Evidence Exposing Pfizer’s ‘Clear Effort to Conceal & Mislead’ about Side Effects of Covid Shots

Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach has announced that investigators have uncovered evidence that pharmaceutical giant Pfizer “knew of multiple side effects” related to its Covid mRNA shots.

Kobach revealed that his office obtained the “information” during a press conference.

“Pfizer knew of multiple side effects…and did not disclose,” Kobach said.

“And in some ways, made statements that were contrary.

“It’s more than just a failure to say that there are side effects.

“They made statements saying there are no side effects in particular cases, when in fact they knew there were side effects and they had data indicating those side effects.”


The news comes after Kobach recently filed a lawsuit against Pfizer for “misleading” the public about the safety of its Covid mRNA shots by masking the “serious adverse events.”

As Slay News reported last week, according to the 179-page lawsuit filed last Monday by Kobach, Pzizer marketed the shot as “safe” despite knowing the injections could cause serious illness and death.

The lawsuit, filed in the District Court of Thomas County, alleges that “Pfizer misled the public that it had a ‘safe and effective’ COVID-19 vaccine.”

During a press conference last Monday, Kobach told reporters:

“Pfizer made multiple misleading statements to deceive the public about its vaccine at a time when Americans needed the truth.”

Slay the latest News for free!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

The Kansas AG added that Pfizer’s “misrepresentations” resulted in “record company revenue” of approximately $75 billion in just two years.

The State of Kansas outlines several specific allegations in its lawsuit:

1. Pfizer misled the public that it had a ‘safe and effective’ COVID-19 vaccine.

2. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public.

3. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was effective even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine waned over time and did not protect against COVID-19 variants. Pfizer concealed this critical effectiveness information from the public.

4. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission of COVID-19 even though it knew it never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission of COVID-19.

5. To keep the public from learning the truth, Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims about its COVID-19 vaccine.

6. Pfizer’s misrepresentations of a ‘safe and effective’ vaccine resulted in record company revenue of approximately $75 billion from COVID-19 vaccine sales in just two years.

7. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated previous consent judgments with the State of Kansas.

8. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act, K.S.A. 50-623 et seq., regardless of whether any individual consumer ultimately received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.

9. Pfizer must be held accountable for falsely representing the benefits of its COVID-19 vaccine while concealing and suppressing the truth about its vaccine’s safety risks, waning effectiveness, and inability to prevent transmission.

Meanwhile, four other states have now followed Kansas’s lead.

The five states now suing Pfizer over the Covid mRNA injections are:

  • Kansas
  • Texas
  • Mississippi
  • Louisiana
  • Utah

All states allege that the pharmaceutical company misled the public about the safety and efficacy of its Covid shots.

The lawsuits claim that Pfizer made false or misleading statements regarding the safety and effectiveness of the injections.

These deceptions potentially violate public trust and legal standards, the lawsuits note.

READ MORE – Major Study Confirms Covid Shots Cause Brain Damage

join telegram


Who is the best president?

By completing this poll, you gain access to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.

By Frank Bergman

Frank Bergman is a political/economic journalist living on the east coast. Aside from news reporting, Bergman also conducts interviews with researchers and material experts and investigates influential individuals and organizations in the sociopolitical world.

Notify of


Would love your thoughts, please comment.x