Nobel Prize-Winning Scientist: ‘Climate Crisis’ Narrative Is a Hoax

A renowned Nobel Prize-winning scientist has spoken out to warn the public that the “climate crisis” narrative being pushed by the global elite and their allies in the corporate media is a hoax.

Dr. John Clauser, the co-winner of the 2022 Nobel Physics prize and one the world’s leading authorities on quantum mechanics, blasted “climate emergency” claims as a “dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people.”

Clauser, who was also awarded the 2010 Wolf Prize in Physics, the second most prestigious physics award after the Nobel, warns that misguided climate science is a hoax that is being driven by “massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience.”

Claims of a “climate crisis” are being promoted around the globe by governments and their media accomplice in an effort to comply with the green agenda goals of the World Economic Forum (WEF), United Nations (UN), the World Health Organization (WHO), and other unelected globalist organizations.

Meeting these goals typically involved plans to slash the quality of life for most of the general public while ramping up taxes to “save the planet.”

Meanwhile, the handful of powerful elites promoting the green agenda will continue to fly around in private jets and eat meat because they are “part of the solution.”

The comments from Clauser cast further doubt on the false claims that 99% of scientists believe humans cause all or most climate change.

Physicists along with chemists play a dominant role in investigating the science surrounding climate.

At its core, the science focuses on heat exchange and the behavior of atmospheric gases.

According to Clauser, climate pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated issues.

It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents, politicians, journalists, government agencies, and environmentalists.

“In my opinion, there is no real climate crisis,” he added.

“There is, however, a very real problem with providing a decent standard of living to the world’s largest population and an associated energy crisis.

Slay the latest News for free!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

“The latter is being unnecessarily exacerbated by what, in my opinion, is incorrect climate science.”

Dr. Clauser is not the first Nobel prize-winner to challenge the “settled” scientific and political narrative of “climate change,” however.

As Slay News reported, the World Climate Declaration has been signed by around 300 climate professors.

“There is no climate emergency,” the document declares.

The lead signatory is the Nobel laureate Professor Ivar Giaever.

The Declaration states that climate models are “not remotely plausible as global policy tools.”

They exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, but ignore any beneficial effect, it explains.

Climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science, it says.

Professor Antonino Zichichi is the holder of Italy’s highest merit order, the Knight Grand Cross of the Order of Merit of the Italian Republic.

The honor was awarded to Zichichi for a lifetime of distinguished scientific work including several discoveries in the field of sub-nuclear physics.

In 2019 he led a group of 48 Italian science professors in stating that human responsibility for climate change is “unjustifiably exaggerated and catastrophic predictions are not realistic.”

In their scientific view, “natural variation explains a substantial part of the global warming observed since 1850.”

Recently, four Italian scientists, including three physics professors, undertook a major review of historical climate trends.

They concluded that there is no real data to support any declaration of a “climate emergency.”

Over many meteorological categories, there was “no clear positive trend of extreme events.”

Of course, cherry-picking single bad or “extreme” weather events will provide the main propaganda firepower for convincing populations that a globalist de-industrialization must take place within less than 30 years.

Last September, leading nuclear physicist Dr. Wallace Manheimer warned that so-called “Net Zero” goals will end modern civilization.

Manheimer observed that the new wind and solar infrastructure would fail, cost trillions, trash large portions of the environment “and be entirely unnecessary.”

The “Climate Industrial Complex” has “somehow” managed to convince enough of the world’s population that carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere, a gas necessary for life on Earth that is exhaled in every breath, “is an environmental poison,” he added.

As regular Slay News readers, or anyone who remembers a high-school biology class, will already know, plants take in CO2 from the air and soil during photosynthesis and produce oxygen.

Humans and other animals then breathe in oxygen and exhale CO2.

It’s a beautiful cycle that has perfectly evolved over millions of years.

Because of this, increases in CO2 help to green the Earth, not poison it.

Dr. Clauser has recently been elected to the board of the Virginia-based CO2 Coalition.

The group is a collective of around 120 scientists and researchers representing a broad range of climate science disciplines.

Welcoming Clauser to the board, the distinguished atmospheric scientist Dr. William Happer, Emeritus Professor at Princeton, said his studies of climate provided strong evidence that there is no climate crisis.

Happer notes that increasing CO2 concentrations would actually benefit the world.

Dr. Happer is a leading proponent of the “saturation” hypothesis of warming gases such as CO2.

He observes that, at certain levels, such gases become saturated in small bands of the infrared spectrum.

As a consequence, their warming ability diminishes on a logarithmic scale.

The observation helps to explain the 600 million-year geological record.

The record shows that CO2 measurements have been up to 20 times higher than current atmospheric levels.

READ MORE: Sweden Dumps Climate Agenda, Scraps Green Energy Targets

SHARE:
join telegram

READERS' POLL

Who is the best president?

By completing this poll, you gain access to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.

By Frank Bergman

Frank Bergman is a political/economic journalist living on the east coast. Aside from news reporting, Bergman also conducts interviews with researchers and material experts and investigates influential individuals and organizations in the sociopolitical world.

Subscribe
Notify of

Recommended

3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x