Democrat vice presidential nominee Tim Walz is continuing to be hung by his own petard amid increasing scrutiny over his claimed career achievements.
Walz, the radical Democrat governor of Minnesota and Vice President Kamala Harris’s running mate, is at the center of a growing scandal for embellishing his record.
Among the most controversial of Walz’s claims are the lies he told about fighting “in war” during his military career.
While Walz did serve in the National Guard, he has falsely claimed to have been in battle, despite the fact that he retired shortly after learning his battalion was about to be deployed to Iraq in 2004.
As Slay News reported earlier, several National Guard veterans who served with Walz have just come forward with damning whistleblowing allegations.
Recalling their time serving with Walz, the vets describe the Minnesota governor as “a coward” and “a habitual liar” who has “no integrity.”
WATCH:
Washington Post reporter Kathleen Parker has now exposed several more discrepancies in Gov. Walz’s public narratives, casting an even darker shadow over his vice-presidential campaign.
The revelations surfaced after Harris announced Walz as her running mate.
The move brought his past records into the limelight.
Parker accuses Walz of fabricating aspects of his resume to enhance his political image.
In the contentious op-ed, Parker elaborates on Walz’s military service and his accounts of a DUI incident in 1995.
Walz also previously asserted his experience carrying a gun during the war, though he was never deployed to a combat zone.
WATCH:
These claims have been met with skepticism among veterans and constituents alike.
Furthermore, Parker recounts the episode from 1995 when Walz, then a school teacher, was arrested for drunk driving in Nebraska.
Walz contended that his intoxication was a misunderstanding due to hearing issues linked to his military service, a claim that had been questioned during his 2006 congressional campaign.
Despite these controversies, Walz’s historical assertions have drawn significant attention, propelling the narrative into the realms of national news due to his new role in a high-stakes national campaign.
Walz’s tenure and narratives came under more scrutiny during a CNN interview conducted by Dana Bash alongside Kamala Harris.
Parker criticized Walz’s responses, labeling them evasive and ineffective at addressing the questions posed about his military and personal history.
In particular, his reply to a question about his claim of engaging in warfare was deemed unsatisfactory.
Walz claimed he repeatedly made false claims about fighting “in war” due to “bad grammar.”
CNN’s Bash didn’t challenge Walz on this claim, however.
Parker also expressed disappointment with the soft-pitch nature of the questions, underscoring a missed opportunity for more rigorous journalistic inquiry.
This aspect of the interview was noted to undermine the electorate’s ability to make informed choices.
The Harris-Walz campaign has remained silent in response to the Fox News Digital request for comment, leaving the public and the media parsing through the details provided by Parker and other sources to form their own judgments.
As the election approaches, the focus on Walz’s record illustrates the critical vetting process for candidates in the limelight.
His history is now a focal point not only for his political adversaries but also for voters who are gauging his suitability for the nation’s vice presidency.
Walz continues to defend his record, underscoring his dedication and service in various capacities, both as a teacher and in the military.
These roles, according to his campaign, equip him with the necessary skills and perspective to serve effectively as the vice president.
The evolving narrative around Walz will potentially shape the broader political discourse, impacting both his and Harris’s chances in the upcoming electoral battle.
The unfolding discussions will undoubtedly influence voter perception and are expected to dominate political dialogues as the campaign season intensifies.
