Rothschild Admits ‘Woke’ ESG Has Failed, Pushes ‘Inclusive Capitalism’ Agenda

The head of the Rothschild banking dynasty has admitted that the globalists’ “woke” environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) agenda has failed.

ESG is a set of “considerations” for investing that was developed by the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the organization’s members and allies.

The set of rules pressures companies to include environmental issues, social issues, and corporate governance that comply with the WEF’s agenda.

With the emergence of the Covid pandemic in 2020, the WEF found new opportunities to advance its “Great Reset” agenda.

The WEF’s agenda seeks to strip members of the general public of all rights, freedoms, privacy, and security while handing complete control of society over to globalist elites.

In July of last year, as the hype surrounding the Covid pandemic was finally dying, a barely publicized project called the “Council For Inclusive Capitalism” emerged.

The group is headed by Lynn Forester de Rothschild.

The wife of the late Evelyn de Rothschild, who died in November 2022, has now become the public face of the notorious Rothschild dynasty.

“Council For Inclusive Capitalism” is the culmination of decades of various globalist agendas combined to represent the ultimate proof of the “New World Order” conspiracy.

Critics once argued that the idea of global governance by elitists was a paranoid fantasy.

However, the plan is an openly admitted reality.


Slay the latest News for free!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

The CIC is intimately tied to unelected globalist institutions like the WEF, the United Nations (UN), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF)

However, it is primarily an attempt to link all these organizations more closely to the corporate world in an open display of collusion.

The group pushes the spread of what they call “Stakeholder Capitalism.”

“Stakeholder Capitalism” is the idea that international corporations have a responsibility to participate in social engineering.

As such, corporations are required to manipulate civilization through economic punishments and rewards for “the greater good.”

We witnessed this agenda in action during the Covid lockdowns and the rush to enforce vaccine passports.

These efforts would not have been possible without the participation of major corporate chains working hand-in-hand with national governments and the UN’s World Health Organization (WHO).

Luckily, the strategy failed as local governments and the public fought back.

We have also seen stakeholder capitalism pushed in the form of ESG rating systems among major companies.

Most of the public was blissfully unaware of the ESG agenda until the past 2 years.

However, globalists have been developing ESG rules since 2005.

In an explanation of what ESG is, WEF founder and chairman Klaus Schwab notes:

The most important characteristic of the stakeholder model today is that the stakes of our system are now more clearly global.

Economies, societies, and the environment are more closely linked to each other now than 50 years ago.

The model we present here is therefore fundamentally global in nature, and the two primary stakeholders are as well.

…What was once seen as externalities in national economic policy making and individual corporate decision making will now need to be incorporated or internalized in the operations of every government, company, community, and individual.

The planet is thus the center of the global economic system, and its health should be optimized in the decisions made by all other stakeholders.

ESG was intended to be the tool that globalists and governments would use to force companies into the stakeholder capitalism model.

It works in the same way as the Chinese Communist Party’s social credit system but for businesses rather than individuals.

The higher a company’s ESG score, the more access to “easy money” they would have, such as lending and government funding.

Launching in 2005, ESG focused on climate controls by influencing corporations to accept carbon credits and taxation.

But, by 2016 it became something else as ESG widely adopted “woke” politics including Critical Race Theory (CRT), feminism, transgender ideology, and various elements of Marxism.

This was the modern ESG that most of us are familiar with today.

The goal was to incentivize corporations into bombarding the public with woke messaging and political propaganda.

Every movie, every TV show, every book, every comic, every children’s cartoon, every commercial, every product, every major social media site, every employee handbook, every social interaction would be tainted with the poison of woke propaganda.

There would be nowhere to hide, nowhere to escape the messaging.

This agenda worked successfully for some time, until recently.

The exposure of ESG is perhaps one of the greatest triumphs of independent media.

It was proof that the “wokification” of our economy and society was not the result of some grassroots activist movement or the natural evolution of civilization.

Everything woke was a rigged agenda that was forced into existence by corporations and globalists using ESG as the vehicle to create a faux movement.

Lynn Forester de Rothschild was recently forced to admit the defeat of ESG at the B20 Summit in India.

However, Rothschild also suggests that the goal will be to rebrand ESG to continue pushing the same agenda.

She suggested replacing the term “ESG” with something else that the public is not as privy to.

In other words, the globalists have been forced to abandon ESG but will continue to look for other methods to trap companies in the far-left hive.


It is typical for globalists to re-brand their projects whenever they get exposed as a way to throw the public off the scent.

However, this tactic is becoming tired.

Researchers are locked onto the ESG dynamic and changing the name will not help the establishment avoid scrutiny.

One interesting comment from Rothschild at B20 was her claim that Democrat President Joe Biden’s “Inflation Reduction Act” is one of the best models for incentivized climate controls.

This confirms suspicions that the Inflation Reduction Act had nothing to do with inflation.

Rather, it was a way to divert taxpayer funds into government subsidies for carbon taxation and green agenda tech.

That is to say, Rothschild and the CIC want to dictate global business and force companies to adopt ESG-like policies using trillions of dollars in climate funds ($7.5 trillion per year, to be exact).

The agenda being promoted by Rothschild and the WEF has nothing to do with protecting the environment or public health: It’s ALL about the economy.

The end game for the global elite is to convince the public to embrace economic micromanagement.

Once the economy is locked into an ideological prison where businesses are forced to virtue signal, once access to private trade can be denied by a handful of bureaucrats working with corporations, the establishment then has the means to dictate every other facet of society.

Our behaviors, our beliefs, our principles, our morals; everything is up for grabs.

If the unelected oligarchy has the power to determine whether you and your family eat or starve, they then have the power to make you do anything they want you to do.

READ MORE: WEF Bureaucrat Calls for Military to Vaccinate Public: ‘No Science’

Advertise with Slay News
join telegram


Who is the best president?

By completing this poll, you gain access to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.

By Frank Bergman

Frank Bergman is a political/economic journalist living on the east coast. Aside from news reporting, Bergman also conducts interviews with researchers and material experts and investigates influential individuals and organizations in the sociopolitical world.

Notify of
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x