Supreme Court Declines Request to Stop Pennsylvania Counting ‘Naked Ballots’

The United States Supreme Court has declined to take up a case seeking to block Pennsylvania from counting “naked ballots.”

As Election Day inches closer, the fight over ballots — early, provision, absentee, and other types — has already begun.

As a result, the U.S. Supreme Court is already making decisions.

According to USA Today, the Supreme Court declined to block the counting of some provisional ballots in the key battleground state of Pennsylvania.

The Republican Party requested the high court take up the case and issue the block.

At stake are thousands of votes that could potentially shift the election in what analysts believe is a tight race.

The GOP filed the request after the Pennsylvania Supreme Court “said voters should be able to cast provisional ballots if they failed to encase an absentee ballot in the required secrecy sleeve.”

The obvious issue with such a rule, as the Republican Party pointed out, is that it gives voters an unauthorized “do-over” for what were described as “naked ballots.”

The Republican Party moved hard and fast on the issue given the sheer importance of the state to President Donald Trump’s chances at winning on Nov. 5.

Both candidates would almost guarantee a path to the White House with Pennsylvania win.

Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris’s campaign applauded the Supreme Court’s rejection of the GOP challenge.

The Democratic Party joined Harris in the celebration.

The outlet noted:

Slay the latest News for free!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

In a joint statement, spokespeople for the Democratic Party and Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign said Republicans have been trying to make it harder for votes to count in Pennsylvania and across the country.

The dispute originally erupted over two votes cast in the state’s primary.

Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch wrote in a joint statement that if Justice Samuel Alito paused the state’s court order, it “would not prevent the consequences they fear.”

Alito described the issue as “a matter of considerable importance,” but didn’t take a side in the fight.

USA Today described what provisional ballots mean in the state:

State law allows provisional ballots if the voter “did not cast any other ballot, including an absentee ballot, in the election.”

It also says a provisional ballot “shall not be counted if the elector’s absentee ballot or mail-in ballot is timely received by a county board of elections.”

Notably, the provisional ballots are set aside until Election Day.

They will only be counted when the eligibility of the voter is confirmed.

Both sides argued why they believed the case was valid or not necessary, with Democrats arguing that the SCOTUS shouldn’t be involved

Only time will tell if it ultimately matters.

READ MORE – Federal Judge Rules North Carolina Must Count Insecure Absentee Ballots in Violation of State Law

SHARE:
join telegram

READERS' POLL

Who is the best president?

By completing this poll, you gain access to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.

Subscribe
Notify of

Recommended

3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x