Supreme Court Rejects Republican-Backed Election Integrity Case

The United States Supreme Court has rejected a request to hear an election integrity law case backed by Montana Republicans.

The dispute concerns the scope that state legislatures have to set the rules of federal elections.

Montana’s Republican legislature passed a pair of election integrity laws that were blocked by the state’s left-leaning Supreme Court.

In their request to the U.S. Supreme Court, Montana Republicans said the case is an ideal vehicle for resolving unanswered questions about the court’s 2023 precedent Moore v. Harper.

In that case, the Supreme Court largely rejected the so-called independent legislature theory.

The theory holds that state legislatures have exclusive power to make the rules of elections.

While the SCOTUS found that judicial review is permissible by state courts, they noted that courts do not have “free rein.”

Montana’s Republicans argue the state’s Supreme Court is exercising free rein and stepping on the legislature’s power to set election law.

In a statement responding to the decision, Montana Republicans wrote.

TOP DEAL FROM PREMIUM GADGET STORE

“In short, the Montana Supreme Court has assumed a de facto new role as the final and exclusive arbiter of all federal election legislation in Montana.

“This Court’s review is urgently needed.”

Montana’s Supreme Court has interpreted the state’s constitution from a liberal perspective, recently ruling there is a right to be protected from “greenhouse gases.”

Christi Jacobsen, Montana’s Republican secretary of state, asked the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold a pair of election laws that the Montana Supreme Court struck down 5-2.

Slay the latest News for free!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

The laws banned same-day voter registration and paid, third-party ballot harvesting.

The state’s top court found that the laws violated the right to vote under the state constitution.

Montana’s Democrats are fighting to block those laws, which they say would “disenfranchise” some voters.

“The court’s analysis was based on the ample trial record in this case and firmly grounded in existing Montana law,” the Democrats wrote in court filings.

“There was nothing extraordinary or inappropriate about it.”

Moore v. Harper arose from a dispute over North Carolina’s congressional districts after the 2020 census.

The state’s Supreme Court ruled the map was an unlawful partisan gerrymander favoring Republicans.

The case garnered significant attention, with former President Barack Obama praising the United States Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision.

Obama described the ruling as “a resounding rejection of the far-right theory that has been peddled by election deniers and extremists seeking to undermine our democracy.”

Montana’s petition was backed by the National Republican Senatorial Committee, 15 other Republican state attorneys general, and the America First Legal Foundation.

The Supreme Court rejected the case without explanation.

READ MORE – Supreme Court Green Lights Lawsuits Against Fossil Fuel Industry Seeking Billions in Damages for ‘Climate Change’

SHARE:
join telegram

READERS' POLL

Who is the best president?

By completing this poll, you gain access to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.

Subscribe
Notify of

Recommended

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x