Ted Cruz: Biden ‘Funneled’ $66 Million in Taxpayer Funds to ‘Censor’ Americans

Republican Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) is demanding answers after discovering that Democrat President Joe Biden and his administration “funneled” $66 million in taxpayer cash to fund efforts to “censor” the American people.

Cruz says the Biden admin pumped tax dollars to nonprofits and academic institutions for “misinformation research.”

This “research” essentially sought to shut down dissenters who express non-Democrat-approved wrongthink.

According to the senator, the Biden admin funded the non-governmental organizations in an attempt to “absolve” itself of “liability for infringement of Americans’ First Amendment rights.”

Cruz is now demanding the State Department, FBI, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and the National Science Foundation turn over information to the Senate.

The senator is seeking all information regarding the agencies’ roles in “helping facilitate the censorship of Americans’ constitutionally protected speech online.”

The move comes as part of Cruz’s months-long investigation into Big Tech’s content moderation and alleged censorship practices.

Cruz’s office says the ongoing investigation has “exposed the extent to which suppression of free speech on social media has been driven by government agencies and non-governmental third parties that receive funding from taxpayers.”

In letters to the State Department, FBI, CISA, and NSF, Cruz said the Biden administration “directly” flagged content to social media companies for censorship.

He said the Biden admin also “funneled money to private-sector third parties, including nonprofits and academic institutions that then pressured social media companies to remove content and accounts.”

“By laundering taxpayer dollars through third parties, government agencies tried to absolve themselves of liability for infringement of Americans’ First Amendment rights,” Cruz wrote.

Cruz provided examples, including one in which the State Department made an effort to “counter foreign state and non-state propaganda and disinformation efforts” and sent social media companies lists of individuals that they identified as “inauthentic.”

However, Cruz’s investigation revealed that those lists included not only foreign actors but “everyday Americans.”

Slay the latest News for free!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Cruz also said the National Science Foundation sent millions of dollars to fund “Election Integrity Partnerships” at Stanford University and the University of Washington.

The senator said those programs successfully influenced social media companies into “moderating” millions of tweets flagged by CISA and the FBI.

Cruz pointed to a 2021 interview with the leader of the Stanford University program.

He said the lead researcher suggested taxpayer dollars were “intentionally channeled through a third party so that the government could evade First Amendment liability.”

“Just because the government hires a hitman to kill speech does not absolve the government of guilt,” Cruz wrote in the letters.

“Regrettably, the examples described above appear to be just a handful of numerous instances of third parties being awarded taxpayer dollars and other government support to suppress speech.”

Cruz added: “It has also become apparent that our nation’s higher education institutions were often used as conduits through which the government could police speech online.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) also signed onto Cruz’s letter to the FBI.

Cruz asks the agencies to provide detailed information regarding their taxpayer-funded grant-making and non-governmental partnerships processes.

The deadline for the agencies to respond is December 19, 2023.

Since the onset of Cruz’s long investigation, Senate Commerce Committee Republican staff have identified more than 100 National Science Foundation grants between 2021 and 2023.

The taxpayer-funded grants totaled more than $66 million in funding toward “misinformation” research.

Among others, the committee found that NSF sent:

  • $5 million to the University of Washington to create a “digital dashboard” so that public officials could identify “trending misinformation” and “strategically correct” misinformation on social media
  • $5 million to George Washington University to create a therapy toolkit and digital reporting assistant for journalists who believed they were the targets of “misinformation-driven harassment campaigns”
  • More than $100,0000 to Georgia Tech to create a program that writes posts for social media users to counter “misinformation”

Meanwhile, Cruz’s investigation comes amid a similar House Weaponization Subcommittee probe.

In June, that panel also said CISA had “facilitated the censorship of Americans directly” and through third-party intermediaries during the Biden administration.

In June, CISA Executive Director Brandon Wales said the agency “does not and has never censored speech or facilitated censorship; any such claims are patently false.”

“Every day, the men and women of CISA execute the agency’s mission of reducing risk to U.S. critical infrastructure in a way that protects Americans’ freedom of speech, civil rights, civil liberties, and privacy,” Wales said.

“In response to concerns from election officials of all parties regarding foreign influence operations and disinformation that may impact the security of election infrastructure, CISA mitigates the risk of disinformation by sharing information on election literacy and election security with the public and by amplifying the trusted voices of election officials across the nation.”

Founded in 2018, CISA was intended to be an agency focused on protecting critical infrastructure and guarding against cybersecurity threats.

READ MORE: Texas Sues Pfizer for Conspiracy to Censor Vaccine Critics

Advertise with Slay News
join telegram


Who is the best president?

By completing this poll, you gain access to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.

By Frank Bergman

Frank Bergman is a political/economic journalist living on the east coast. Aside from news reporting, Bergman also conducts interviews with researchers and material experts and investigates influential individuals and organizations in the sociopolitical world.

Notify of
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x