Second Biden Whistleblower Comes Forward: ‘Troubling and Unacceptable’

A second IRS whistleblower in the criminal investigation of Hunter Biden has forward, congressional lawmakers have revealed.

The whistleblower raised the alarm in documents sent to Congress on Monday.

They came forward after the Department of Justice (DOJ) purged the entire team looking into Democrat President Joe Biden’s son for tax fraud and related crimes.

The second whistleblower worked on the probe since 2018.

The whistleblower wrote an email to seven senior IRS officials, including Commissioner Daniel Werfel, stating that he believes he was removed for doing the “right thing.”

“As I’m sure you were aware, I was removed this week from a highly sensitive case after nearly 5 years of work,” the new whistleblower wrote.

“I was not afforded the opportunity of a phone call directly from my [special agent in charge] or [assistant special agent in charge], even though this had been my investigation since the start.

“There is a human impact to the decisions being made that no one in the government seems to care about or understand.

“I have spent thousands of hours on the case, worked to complete 95% of the investigation, have sacrificed sleep/vacations/gray hairs etc., my husband and I (identifying me as the case agent) were publicly outed and ridiculed on social media due to our sexual orientation, and to ultimately be removed for always trying to do the right thing, is unacceptable in my opinion.

“For the last couple of years, my [supervisor] and I have tried to gain the attention of our senior leadership about certain issues prevalent regarding the investigation.

“I have asked for countless meetings with our chief and deputy chief, often to be left out on an island and not heard from.

“The lack of IRS-Criminal Investigation senior leadership involvement in this investigation is deeply troubling and unacceptable.

Slay the latest News for free!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

“Rather than recognizing the need to ensure close engagement and full support of the investigatory team in this extraordinarily sensitive case, the response too often had been that we were isolated (even when I said on multiple occasions that I wasn’t being heard and that I thought I wasn’t able to perform my job adequately because of the actions of the USAO and DOJ, my concerns were ignored by senior leadership).

“The ultimate decision to remove the investigatory team from [redacted] without actually talking with that investigatory team, in my opinion, was a decision made not to side with the investigators but to side with the US Attorney’s office and Department of Justice who we have been saying for some time has been acting inappropriately,” he wrote.

READ MORE: IRS Can Secretly Obtain Bank Records of Americans NOT under Investigation, Supreme Court Rules

SHARE:
Advertise with Slay News
join telegram

READERS' POLL

Who is the best president?

By completing this poll, you gain access to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.

By David Hawkins

David Hawkins is a writer who specializes in political commentary and world affairs. He's been writing professionally since 2014.

Subscribe
Notify of
1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x