Twitter deliberately exaggerated claims about Russian propaganda flooding its platform in an effort to appease the Democrats and their allies in the corporate media, the latest installment of the โTwitter Filesโ has revealed.
According to journalist Matt Taibbi, who released another batch of the internal communication files this week, Twitter found no evidence that Russia was ramping up its influence efforts on the social media platform.
Twitterโs own internal investigations found that the claim was a โdud,โ Taibbi revealed.
Nevertheless, Twitterโs former executives continued to push the Democratsโ narrative that Russia was using bots to spread propaganda and influence Americaโs elections, despite knowing it was false.
Twitter initially tried to stay out of the spotlight on the Russia issue in 2017.
The companyโs execs were hoping that rival Facebook would remain the main target of scrutiny from the media and Democrats.
Twitterโs PR department even agreed on a media strategy to โkeep the focus on FB.โ
4.โKEEP THE FOCUS ON FBโ: Twitter was so sure they had no Russia problem, execs agreed the best PR strategy was to say nothing on record, and quietly hurl reporters at Facebook: pic.twitter.com/O3JtmId6MJ
โ Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) January 3, 2023
7.Receiving these meager results, a furious Senator Mark Warner of Virginia โ ranking Democrat on the Intelligence Committee โ held an immediate press conference to denounce Twitterโs report as โfrankly inadequate on every level.โ pic.twitter.com/DAkX13igEE
โ Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) January 3, 2023
But after getting blasted by Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) for an โinadequateโ response to allegations of Russian meddling, Twitterโs public policy VP said the company should โkeep producing materialโ on Russian interference to satisfy the Democrats.
As a result, Twitter formed a โRussia Task Force,โ to investigate Russian influence on the platform.
However, the task force found little evidence of significant Russian involvement on the platform.
In October 2017, the task force reported that it had foundย โno evidence of a coordinated approach, all of the accounts found seem to be lone-wolf type activity (different timing, spend, targeting, <$10k in ad spend).โ
16.OCT 23 2017: โFinished with investigationโฆ 2500 full manual account reviews, we think this is exhaustiveโฆ 32 suspicious accounts and only 17 of those are connected with Russia, only 2 of those have significant spend one of which is Russia Todayโฆremaining <$10k in spend.โ pic.twitter.com/Kkdyx4HDOr
โ Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) January 3, 2023
After reviewing 2,500 accounts manually, the task force could only find โ32 suspicious accounts and only 17 of those are connected with Russia, only 2 of those have significant spend one of which is Russia Todayโฆremaining <$10k in spend.โ
โWe think this is exhaustive,โ concluded the task force.
What followed was a torrent of pressure from the media, liberal academics, and politicians.
In a quote toย Politico,ย one โintelligence expertโ โ Johns Hopkins professor Thomas Rid โ said, โwere Twitter a contractor for the FSBโฆ they could not have built a more effective disinformation platform.โ
Politicoย claimed that Twitter had โdeleted data potentially crucial to Russia probes.โ
In November, Buzzfeed released a report based on findings from the University of Sheffield in the UK.
The report alleged that a โnew networkโ on Twitter had โclose connections toโฆ Russian-linked bot accounts.โ
Internally, Twitter concluded that while the accounts were linked to Russia, there was no evidence of them being linked to Russian intelligence.
Moreover, the platform concluded that they were primarily German-language, and not active in the U.S. election.
29. โSENATE INTEL COMMITTEE IS ASKINGโฆ POSSIBLE TO WHIP SOMETHING TOGETHER?โ Still, when the Buzzfeed piece came out, the Senate asked for โa write up of what happened.โ Twitter was soon apologizing for the same accounts theyโd initially told the Senate were not a problem. pic.twitter.com/mIUmJtRLVc
โ Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) January 3, 2023
Following inquiries from the Senate Intelligence Committee, requesting a โwrite-upโ on the accounts identified by the University of Sheffield, Twitter chose not to defend itself.
โTwitter was soon apologizing for the same accounts theyโd initially told the Senate were not a problem,โ reported Taibbi.
31.Twitter soon settled on its future posture.
In public, it removed content โat our sole discretion.โ
Privately, they would โoff-boardโ anything โidentified by the U.S.. intelligence community as a state-sponsored entity conducting cyber-operations.โ pic.twitter.com/Jc94kEg2KR
โ Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) January 3, 2023
Twitter then settled on a strategy that involved lying to the public.
The company decided it would publicly claim that it sanctioned accounts โat its sole discretion.โ
But its private guidance to employees was to suspend from its ads platform any account identified by the U.S. intelligence community as a state-sponsored asset attempting to influence U.S. elections.
Our comment section is restricted to members of the Slay News community only.
To join, create a free account HERE.
If you are already a member, log in HERE.
Recommended