United Nations: Censoring ‘Disinformation’ Will Protect ‘Free Speech’

The United Nations (UN) has made renewed calls for increased online regulation and censorship.

The UN is openly embracing the agenda of fighting so-called “disinformation” and “hate speech” online.

The globalist organization insists that censoring the public and unwelcome information is necessary to protect “free speech.”

The UN recently tried to further advance this agenda by holding an event called “Internet for Trust.”

The United Nations’ primary purpose is to facilitate conflict resolution in the real world and provide peacekeeping and humanitarian assistance in war-torn areas.

However, the unelected and well-funded organization is now increasingly following in the footsteps of other unelected, though less formal elite groups, namely the World Economic Forum (WEF).

Now, we have a new announcement about censorship from one of the UN’s agencies, UNESCO.

UNESCO is supposed to promote world peace and security through international education, arts, and sciences cooperation, and protection of world heritage in the forms of monuments, etc.

Yet, it is now crafting its very own “guidelines” to regulate “hate speech” and “misinformation.”

According to an announcement, UNESCO has found a way to explain how (but not when or why) it started to believe it should have this power to regulate online communications.

The agency supports its new agenda by citing its mandate to promote the free circulation of ideas through words and images.

The announcement states:

The internet and social media offer many advantages in the world today. But as we know and we have just heard, individuals are increasingly using it for disinformation. And the reality is they also propagate hate speech.

UNESCO’s global mandate includes the promotion of the free circulation of ideas through words and images.

UNESCO has therefore decided to develop, through multistakeholder consultations, principles for regulation of digital platforms guidelines whose aim is to support the development and implementation of regulation procedures to guarantee freedom of expression and access to information while managing illegal contents and any contents that can be so harmful to democracy and respect for human rights.

And instead of doing just that – the agency argues that stopping the free circulation of often arbitrarily selected (and sometimes contrary to national law) “unwanted” information, and regulating that, is apparently the way to go.

Slay the latest News for free!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

The Regulation of Digital Platforms guidelines, which UNESCO is developing, does pay what looks like unavoidable lip service to freedom of expression and access to information.

Nevertheless, the main goal is to “manage” what the UN deems “illegal contents and any contents that can be so harmful to democracy and respect for human rights.”

That’s a handily broad definition to cover a lot of things – whether truly harmful or not – and the whole idea is sure to make quite a few free speech proponents unhappy.

But those behind it are very keen to be working on guidelines to “support the development and implementation of regulation procedures” aimed at “guaranteeing” access to information, and freedom of expression, but primarily, really, to “manage” whatever is labeled as illegal any content that somebody decides could harm democracy and human rights.

In announcing the Internet for Trust conference, UNESCO mentioned looking for ways to combat hate speech, misogyny, doxxing, conspiracy theories, and even the suppression of free speech.

UNESCO Director-General Audrey Azoulay declared that regulation is necessary online.

“The blurring of boundaries between true and false, the highly-organized denial of scientific facts, the amplification of disinformation and conspiracies – these did not originate on social networks,” the UNESCO head said.

“But, in the absence of regulation, they flourish there much better than the truth.

“Only by taking the full measure of this technological revolution can we ensure it does not sacrifice human rights, freedom of expression, and democracy,” she said.

“For information to remain a common good, we must reflect and act now, together.”

READ MORE: Roald Dahl’s Classic Children’s Books Censored in Major ‘Woke’ Effort

SHARE:
join telegram

READERS' POLL

Who is the best president?

By completing this poll, you gain access to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.

By Frank Bergman

Frank Bergman is a political/economic journalist living on the east coast. Aside from news reporting, Bergman also conducts interviews with researchers and material experts and investigates influential individuals and organizations in the sociopolitical world.

Subscribe
Notify of

Recommended

6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x