WHO Demands Crackdown on Critics of Anti-Human Agenda

The World Health Organization (WHO) is demanding that global governments begin cracking down on members of the public who criticize the United Nations (UN) agency’s anti-human agenda.

Like its parent agency, the UN, the WHO has been advancing plans that seek to strip citizens of their rights and freedoms in order to assert global control.

Along with the World Economic Forum (WEF), the unelected globalist organizations are hoping to usher in their agenda by claiming that anti-humanity measures are vital in the “fight” against looming pandemics and “climate change.”

However, most of the taxpaying public doesn’t want to be forced to live in mud huts, eat insects, give up travel, be boosted to death, or be locked in their homes, all while paying to fund bureaucrats who impose such measures.

Unfortunately for the WHO, public pushback against its globalist agenda is now derailing plans for its “Global Pandemic Treaty” to be adopted by governments.

During the May 27-June 1 World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland, the WHO failed to garner support from independent nations willing to surrender their sovereign rights.

Rather than win over critics with reassurances ahead of the next stage of his campaign to promote the failed scheme, the WHO has other plans.

The WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and other globalists have instead doubled down, urging a crackdown on critics of their agenda.

Tedros has spent several months promoting his “Global Pandemic Treaty.”

Under the agreement, nations around the world will agree to surrender their sovereign powers to the WHO in the event of an “emergency.”

Such an “emergency” would be decided by the WHO and declared by the agency.

In such an event, the WHO would have the power to override the laws of individual nations under the guise of tackling the emergency.

This would allow the WHO to declare a “pandemic” and then order citizens to be vaccinated and locked in their homes.

Slay the latest News for free!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

The unelected agency would also be able to censor citizens, overriding the First Amendment.

Additionally, the WHO would be able to declare an “emergency” for non-pandemic reasons, such as “fighting climate change.”

The move would open up all citizens in United Nations member states to be forced into “climate lockdowns.”

In his Feb. 12 Dubai address, entitled, “A Pact with the Future: Why the Pandemic Agreement Is Mission-Critical for Humanity,” Tedros said:

“We cannot allow this historic agreement, this milestone in global health, to be sabotaged by those who spread lies, either deliberately or unknowingly.”

The critics whom Tedros branded liars and “conspiracy theorists” include those who warn the pact would undermine national sovereignty as well as those skeptical of the WHO’s competence.

In the latter case, the WHO did itself no favors in recent years, particularly during the pandemic.

After all, the organization reportedly aided the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in its cover-up of COVID-19’s origins.

The organization also told the nations of the world not to restrict travelers from China or close their borders even though the CCP had domestically.

Further, the WHO granted Beijing a veto over the WHO’s COVID-19 origins report.

It also endorsed vaccines that were not nearly as safe or as effective as advertised.

Prior to the pandemic, it also courted controversy with its sexual abuse scandalwasteful spending, and corruption.

Apparently, it was not enough for the WHO director to demean opponents of his grand scheme to see it through.

“Of course, we all wish that we had been able to reach a consensus on the agreement in time for this health assembly, and cross the finish line,” Tedros said in his opening remarks at the 77th World Health Assembly.

“I remain confident that you still will because where there is a will, there is a way.

“I know that there remains among you a common will to get this done.”

In the days that followed, the assembly failed to cross the finish line or even come close.

As a result, Tedros has sought to transform the race into a marathon.

Desperate to keep the dream alive after two years of futile negotiations, the WHO had countries agree to continue negotiating the proposed globalist pact.

A package of half-measures has apparently been accepted to tide over pandemic treaty supporters in the meantime.

In a statement Saturday, the WHO said that the World Health Assembly and its 194 member countries “agreed [on] a package of critical amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR), and made concrete commitments to completing negotiations on a global pandemic agreement within a year, at the latest.”

The half-measures compromise amendments to the IHR that will supposedly “strengthen global preparedness, surveillance, and responses to public health emergencies, including pandemics.”

The measures seek to expand the definition of “pandemic” to include “climate change” and promote Marxist ideology such as “equity.”

These include a new definition for “pandemic emergency”; another “equity”-driven international wealth re-distribution mechanism; the creation of a new bureaucracy to oversee the implementation of the other half-measures; and the creation of IHR authorities for member countries to “improve coordination of the implementation of the Regulations within and among countries.”

“The amendments to the International Health Regulations will bolster countries’ ability to detect and respond to future outbreaks and pandemics by strengthening their own national capacities, and coordination between fellow States, on disease surveillance, information sharing and response,” said Tedros.

“This is built on a commitment to equity, an understanding that health threats do not recognize national borders, and that preparedness is a collective endeavor.”

After negotiators failed to produce a draft deal for approval by the WHO annual assembly, Tedros gave a speech promoting health initiatives and vaccines.

Toward the end of his remarks, he noted:

“You know, the serious challenge that’s posed by anti-vaxxers and I think we need to strategize to really push back because vaccines work, vaccines affect adults, and we have science, evidence on our side.”

“I think it’s time to be more aggressive in pushing back on anti-vaxxers,” continued the WHO director.

“I think they use COVID as an opportunity and, you know, all the havoc they’re creating.

“Maybe that’s one of the messages I’d also like to include in whatever I have [to] say.”


READ MORE – mRNA Inventor: Globalists Are Pushing ‘Death Agenda’ to ‘End Humanity’

join telegram


Who is the best president?

By completing this poll, you gain access to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.

By Frank Bergman

Frank Bergman is a political/economic journalist living on the east coast. Aside from news reporting, Bergman also conducts interviews with researchers and material experts and investigates influential individuals and organizations in the sociopolitical world.

Notify of


Would love your thoughts, please comment.x