Hollywood legend James Woods has denounced twice-failed Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton after Special Counsel John Durham released his damning final report.
Durham said the FBI had no verified intelligence or evidence when it launched the “Crossfire Hurricane” probe of Trump’s campaign in the summer of 2016.
The report reveals that the Trump-Russia story was a Clinton campaign plan to sabotage Trump.
Durham found that Hillary’s anti-Trump plan was briefed in August 2016 to former President Barack Obama, then-Vice President Joe Biden, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and ex-FBI Director James Comey.
Woods fired back at the suspects behind the scheme, saying: “The Russia hoax was substantially no different than Watergate.
“Democrat propagandists masquerading as mainstream news will sweep this under the rug by the weekend, while Hollywood will ride the Watergate pony for yet another half-century.
“When will the hearings start?”
As Slay News reported earlier, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) is currently scheduling hearings to begin next week.
Jordan confirmed that Durham is being called to testify.
Woods said of Hillary: “She was within inches of stealing the presidency of the United States while running the biggest election fraud in history.”
She was within inches of stealing the presidency of the United States while running the biggest election fraud in history. #DurhamReport pic.twitter.com/0fA7i42iII
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) May 15, 2023
The Russia hoax was substantially no different than Watergate. Democrat propagandists masquerading as mainstream news will sweep this under the rug by the weekend, while Hollywood will ride the Watergate pony for yet another half century.
When will the hearings start?
🦗🦗🦗— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) May 15, 2023
TRUMP WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING:
Durham Report: the plan was placed by Hillary Clinton to create a false story linking Donald Trump to Russia was briefed in August of 2016 by CIA Director John Brennan to President Obama, VP Biden, AG Loretta Lynch, and FBI Director Comey. pic.twitter.com/qRGkxLi1oC
— Graham Allen (@GrahamAllen_1) May 15, 2023
The Durham report says: “Neither U.S. law enforcement nor the Intelligence Community appears to have possessed any actual evidence of collusion in their holdings at the commencement of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.
“Based on the review of Crossfire Hurricane and related intelligence activities, we concluded the Department and the FBI failed to uphold their important mission of strict fidelity to the law in connection with certain events and activities described in this report.
“The FBI personnel also repeatedly disregarded important requirements when they continued to seek renewals of that FISA surveillance while acknowledging — both then and in hindsight — that they did not genuinely believe there was probable cause to believe that the target was knowingly engaged in clandestine intelligence activities on behalf of a foreign power.
“Our investigation also revealed that senior FBI personnel displayed a serious lack of analytical rigor towards the information that they received, especially information received from politically affiliated persons and entities.
“This information in part triggered and sustained Crossfire Hurricane and contributed to the subsequent need for Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation.
“In particular, there was significant reliance on investigative leads provided or funded (directly or indirectly) by Trump’s political opponents.
“The Department did not adequately examine or question these materials and the motivations of those providing them, even when at about the same time the Director of the FBI and others learned of significant and potentially contrary intelligence.
“Our investigation determined that the Crossfire Hurricane investigators did not and could not corroborate any of the substantive allegations contained in the Steele reporting.”
“FBI personnel also repeatedly disregarded important requirements when they continued to seek renewals of that FISA surveillance while acknowledging – both then and in hindsight – that they did not genuinely believe there was probable cause to believe that the target was knowingly engaged in clandestine intelligence activities on behalf of a foreign power, or knowingly helping another person in such activities.
“And certain personnel disregarded significant exculpatory information that should have prompted investigative restraint and re-examination.”
