A World Economic Forum (WEF) member has touted a shocking suggestion for meeting the globalist organization’s “Net Zero” targets.
English primatologist and anthropologist Jane Goodall, who the WEF lists as one of its “agenda contributors,” told her fellow globalists that they could “save the planet” from “global warming” if the Earth’s population was 90 percent smaller than it is today.
Goodall argues that all of the WEF’s “problems” would be solved if fewer humans were walking the Earth.
She made the statement during a panel discussion at the organization’s annual summit in Davos, Switzerland.
The panel was discussing plans for achieving “Net Zero” to comply with the targets for “Agenda 2030” as dictated by the WEF and its fellow unelected globalist organization – the United Nations.
Goodall’s comments have gathered renewed attention after a clip of her statement at the summit was recently shared on Twitter/X.
During the panel discussion, participants were discussing the hurdles they face with ushering in the WEF’s agenda to a non-compliant public.
They complained about the pushback to unpopular policies for fighting “climate change” and ending capitalism.
Goodhall then bemoaned the size of the world’s human population, suggesting that Earth would be better with far fewer people on it.
“We cannot hide away from human population growth,” she told frustrated elites.
“Because it underlies so many of the other problems,” she continued.
“All of these problems that we talk about wouldn’t be a problem if there was the size of the population that it was 500 years ago.”
Jane Goodall thinks the world would be better if the population were reduced by 90%.
Why would she say this? pic.twitter.com/iAMXpDmVgd
— DiedSuddenly (@DiedSuddenly_) September 30, 2023
In 2023, Earth’s human population is estimated to be 8 billion people.
500 years ago, as Goodall, a renowned anthropologist, would know, the population of humans was approximately 435 million.
To satisfy Goodall’s suggestion to solve globalists’ “problems,” 90% of humanity would need to go.
Of course, WEF-sponsored “fact-checkers” will scramble to tell you that directly quoting Goodall’s comments is “misinformation” and you shouldn’t believe your lying ears.
However, Goodall is not the first WEF member to promote the “advantages” of a smaller population of humans.
As Slay News reported, another celebrated WEF member called for a staggering 86 percent reduction in the population of humans, arguing that the goal can be achieved “peacefully.”
The call was made by Dennis Meadows, one of the main authors of the Club of Rome’s 1972 pro-depopulation book “The Limits to Growth.”
Despite his book being published over 50 years ago, his very anti-human ideology remains a key inspiration for the agenda of the WEF and its founder Klaus Schwab.
Meadows argues that most of the world’s population must be wiped out so that the survivors can “have freedom” and a “high standard of living.”
During a 2017 interview, Meadows claimed that genocide of 86% of the world’s population is “inevitable.”
However, he insists that a “benevolent” dictatorship could accomplish the mass de-population “peacefully.”
“We could [ ] have eight or nine billion, probably,” he says of the world’s growing population.
“If we have a very strong dictatorship which is smart … and [people have] a low standard of living,” Meadows says as he explains how the population reduction agenda could be triggered.
“But we want to have freedom and we want to have a high standard of living so we’re going to have a billion people.
“And we’re now at seven, so we have to get back down.
“I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share the experience.”
It’s no coincidence that Meadows’ words echo the words in the 1995 report titled “United Nations Agenda 2030: Global Biodiversity Assessment.”
The report, first presented at the United Nations “climate change” conference COP1, states:
An ‘agricultural world’ in which most human beings are peasants, should be able to support 5 to 7 billion people …
In contrast, a reasonable estimate for an industrialised world society at the present North American material standard of living would be one billion.
As Slay News has reported, Yuval Noah Harari, a top WEF member and senior advisor to Schwab, declared last year that “we just don’t need the vast majority of the population” in today’s world.
According to Harari, most of the general public have now become “redundant” and will be of little use to the global elite in the future.
Harari, who describes himself as a historian and futurist, argues that modern technologies like artificial intelligence “make it possible to replace the people.”
In September last year, Harari gloated that “climate change” will create a “technological Noah’s Ark” on Earth.
He suggested that the “technological Noah’s Ark” would only be beneficial to wealthy “elites” who can save themselves while the rest of humanity perishes.
Meanwhile, an official parliamentary inquiry found in August that Germany has funneled billions of dollars in taxpayer money to Bill Gates’s foundation to fund “population control” programs and other anti-humanity schemes, as Slay News reported.
The German government was forced to reveal the funding after being compelled to hand over records by investigating politicians from the parliamentary group DIE LINKE.
The response to the inquiry revealed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has received around 3.8 billion euros ($4.15 billion) in funding from the German government.
The funds have been directed toward various projects and programs related to globalist initiatives.
The documents show German taxpayers have handed over billions of dollars to pay schemes including population control programs and the United Nations Agenda 2030.